Starmer's vision quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

CXRAndy

Senior Member
I do find that weird though. As someone who worked professionally as a Barrister at QC level. You'd have thought he'd be an excellent communicator and interrogator, unflappable and secure. But...

I seen a couple of QC doing their work, one was bumbling, stuttering, but he did get his points across.

Another was a superb orator, smooth, confident flowing.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
I seen a couple of QC doing their work, one was bumbling, stuttering, but he did get his points across.

Another was a superb orator, smooth, confident flowing.

"I seen" ???
 

CXRAndy

Senior Member
I found it funny and ironic that in a post referring to the oratory skills of QCs/KCs you demonstrate very poor grammar (not necessarily spelling) skills.

You are like the first QC you mentioned, except that you do not get your points across.

I thought you might put the two together.

Was an interesting few days watching the pinnacle of legal profession do their trade.
 

multitool

Pharaoh
I do find that weird though. As someone who worked professionally as a Barrister at QC level. You'd have thought he'd be an excellent communicator and interrogator, unflappable and secure. But...

A barrister has to present a case based on the technical relationship between evidence and the law.

Trump is an excellent communicator. But he would be a shít barrister.
 

icowden

Squire
A barrister has to present a case based on the technical relationship between evidence and the law.
Exactly - he or she has to communicate with the Judge.

Trump is an excellent communicator. But he would be a shít barrister.
Agreed.
 
Top Bottom