Starmer's vision quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Ian H

Legendary Member
Maybe I started before you 😂

You started... but are you going to finish?
 

Stevo 666

Well-Known Member
Well of course not. It also isn't happening. It's made up.

Net migration reached a high of 906,000 in the year ending June 2023. However, it subsequently decreased to 728,000 in the year ending June 2024.

And of course that migration is almost all legal and government approved. It has nothing to do with the people desperately seeking asylum. In YE June 2024 84,000 people claimed asylum successfully but that number includes those arriving via regular routes as well. The peak was created by the new immigration system after leaving the EU and was entirely due to Conservative policies, although a lot of the bump is migration that was deferred due to Covid.

What is made up?
 
And most won't. The bill isn't about most, it's about some.
Surprising then that there don't seem to be any disability rights groups in favour of it. They all feel it will turn into a slippery slope - as it has in other countries - and lead to ill and disabled people feeling the pressure of being a burden to society.

Btw, 'terminally ill' means anyone who will die within 6 months without treatment, which could include anorexics, people on dialysis, or diabetics for example. Other countries have widened the definition without a law change being necessary.

This law isn't a danger to those with a loving family, who can advocate for them, provide support, push for good palliative care, but it's a dogs dinner of a bill with far too little analysis of unintended consequences for those without that. Safeguard after safeguard has been vetoed.

The Royal College of Psychiatrists have now also withdrawn support.

If it's passed that's where NHS investment will go, into helping people die, not into helping them to live pain free and with dignity, which is where it should be going, so that any choice on assisted dying is genuinely freely made.
 

Stevo 666

Well-Known Member
Your statistic about adding the population of manchester to the country each year.

I'm confused by your statement. The immigration figure for the last full year to end of June 2024 was over 700,000 and the city of Manchester has a population of approx 600,000.
 

C R

Veteran
Surprising then that there don't seem to be any disability rights groups in favour of it. They all feel it will turn into a slippery slope - as it has in other countries - and lead to ill and disabled people feeling the pressure of being a burden to society.

Btw, 'terminally ill' means anyone who will die within 6 months without treatment, which could include anorexics, people on dialysis, or diabetics for example. Other countries have widened the definition without a law change being necessary.

This law isn't a danger to those with a loving family, who can advocate for them, provide support, push for good palliative care, but it's a dogs dinner of a bill with far too little analysis of unintended consequences for those without that. Safeguard after safeguard has been vetoed.

The Royal College of Psychiatrists have now also withdrawn support.

If it's passed that's where NHS investment will go, into helping people die, not into helping them to live pain free and with dignity, which is where it should be going, so that any choice on assisted dying is genuinely freely made.

You should really watch The Sea Inside.
 
Can I have the choice please? And who decides what this dignity is you refer to?

Yes, you should have a choice, within limits. I'm not against assisted dying per se. In fact we have it to some extent already. I'm against a bill that is as poorly constructed and ill considered as this one.

As to dignity, we should come to a reasonable consensus as a society as to what it means if we are going to expect the state to assist us to kill ourselves because we don't have it. Some people might think living life in a wheelchair or with blindness means no dignity for them. Would we want assisted dying available for the blind?

It's a sign of society's failure that we see it as undignified to need a high level of help with an illness or disability, or that people who need high amounts of intimate care are viewed as living undignified lives.
 

First Aspect

Active Member
Population/immigration comparisons such as Manchester or Birmingham are akin to measuring volume in units of olympic sized swimming pools, or distance in units of football pitches.
 
Top Bottom