Starmer's vision quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Xipe Totec

Something nasty in the woodshed
Apparently he thinks he should have read the speech first - island of strangers. Anyone still got faith in this bloke?

I think that one guy who was a relentless Starmer UberStan fücked off months ago. Even he couldn't face the humiliation.

Still, it's perennially amusing how poor little MAGAndy keeps on posting Starmer gotchas to embarrass all us stupid lefties. He's never going to work it out, is he? :biggrin:
 

Mr Celine

Senior Member
I've not been around here for a while, and if I click on the usual "catch up from where I left" link, I find I have over a hundred more pages to read. There are limits to my dedication. It's Starmer's fault of course - as someone put it on Twitter, "Everyone hates him for different reasons, and they all have a point." But I'm looking for a bit of in-forum guidance as to what I've missed, on this thread or elsewhere. Summarize and/or point me to some highlights?

Oh, and hello. :girl:

And there was me thinking you'd been outed as an AI model.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c77vr00enzyo

...thriller writer Andrea Bartz, who accused it of stealing her work to train its Claude AI model and build a multi-billion dollar business.
 

CXRAndy

Legendary Member
I think that one guy who was a relentless Starmer UberStan fücked off months ago. Even he couldn't face the humiliation.

Still, it's perennially amusing how poor little MAGAndy keeps on posting Starmer gotchas to embarrass all us stupid lefties. He's never going to work it out, is he? :biggrin:

What that you won't admit you voted for Labour :biggrin:
 

Psamathe

Über Member
This is the main reason. The actual percentages are just fluff.
And Starmer is falling for it with the planes for starters.
When I heard about those planes, weapons and US control my first thought was a sort of indirect bribe. Sort of "look, UK money going to US for stuff US will get to control". Not heard much to make me think different.

Ian
Starmer thought through his spending loads of our money on expensive F-35As
UK’s F-35A fighter jet deal problem: the RAF has no aircraft to refuel them in mid-air
Yet while the F-35A offers greater range than many comparable fighter jets, it still requires in-flight refuelling to operate effectively over extended distances and to return home from such missions. This exposes a critical vulnerability that has been largely overlooked in public commentary: the RAF has no tanker aircraft capable of supporting the F-35A in this way. As a result, these fighter jets – carrying nuclear ordnance or otherwise – are limited in the types of operations they can carry out.

Unlike the F-35B which is compatible with the UK’s current fleet of tankers ...
Ian
 

CXRAndy

Legendary Member
I have never voted Labour in my life, you catastrophically stupid, tone-deaf little shithead.

My my, that touched a delicate part.

Definitely a labour luvvie response :biggrin:
 

Xipe Totec

Something nasty in the woodshed
My my, that touched a delicate part.

Definitely a labour luvvie response :biggrin:

You're wrong about everything else, so you get to be wrong about that too.

And someone needs to point out to you (not that you'll listen or understand) that 'Luvvie' is a slang term for an actor. It literally doesn't mean anything else.
 

CXRAndy

Legendary Member
You're wrong about everything else, so you get to be wrong about that too.

And someone needs to point out to you (not that you'll listen or understand) that 'Luvvie' is a slang term for an actor. It literally doesn't mean anything else.
If you say so ;)
 

CXRAndy

Legendary Member
There seems to be no slowing down of millionaire flight to there countries

1000023569.png
 
Top Bottom