Starmer at PMQ repeatedly insisted that Due Procedue was followed in the appointment of the ambassador.
Do we need a review of the Due Procedures?
Probably but if the prospective appointee fails to disclose their history and stuff emerges post appointment which reveals their lack of frankness then prompt dismissal is the answer.
If I've got it right, aren't all we non-Tory-fans supposed to defend him now because he's Labour?
Who's going to be first? 🤔
If I've got it right, aren't all we non-Tory-fans supposed to defend him now because he's Labour?
Who's going to be first? 🤔
Extortion says @Stevo 666. Yet when the rich threaten to move elsewhere, that's due to leftiebollox higher taxes and should definitely not be seen as extortion.
It was going there anyway
No Brian, what is hoped for is some express criticism of Mandelson and a questionning of the judgement of the PM in appointing him.
Not staying nothing as you seem to do unless it is someone on the right.
Mandelson seems never to have been popular with Labour, except for with Blair and Starmer
A bit surprised you never chastised Stevo over on Cakestop for never ever criticising Tories however dishonest or incompetent they were, TBH.