Starmer's vision quest

[C R]

How do we make the leap to this fella being 'a terrorist'?

He is brown, do you need any more evidence?

 

[CXRAndy]

He is brown, do you need any more evidence?

No he advocates the murder of English people, Jews, police personnel.

We have over 100,000 on terror watch lists in this country alone. Watching them always seem bolting the door after, given we get multiple murders almost monthly from one or another Islamic terrorist.

Better protection would be to deport out of the UK and never let them return-assuming Starmer could secure the border

 

[Blazing Saddles]

He is brown, do you need any more evidence?

I was scrolling up and read this. I actually thought it was Andy who posted those words, because it’s exactly what he means.

 

[CXRAndy]

UK profitability lowest since the 1980s.

Real danger UK could be heading for 1970s doom loop under labours ever burdening employment costs to businesses

 

[TailWindHome]

No he advocates the murder of English people, Jews, police personnel.

So, by this measure Lucy Connolly would be a right wing terrorist, anyone supporting her a terrorist support and Reform a right wing terror group.

 

[CXRAndy]

Class her more freedom fighting, against those who seek to bring down the British culture

 

[TailWindHome]

Class her more freedom fighting, against those who seek to bring down the British culture

By your definition that would make you a terrorist supporter

 

[C R]

By your definition that would make you a terrorist supporter

It has admitted that it would have joined the SS or become a death camp gard.

 

[TailWindHome]

We're gonna need a bigger watchlist

 

[Shortfall]

He would say that though wouldn't he?

Interesting that this is the worst possible Brexit. I wonder if anyone will do anything about that?

Yes he would say that. If you listen to the full interview he sets out his case as to why it is and why it's unlikely that anyone can do anything about it within the current structures we have. He speculates that Farage won't have much success (if he is elected) unless he spends the time before the next election in spelling out a plan and recruiting the right people to implement it. It remains to be seen if he has the will and the energy required to be an effective prime minister. Probably unlikely, in which case Cummins predicts the total collapse of the existing order and the emergence of new parties. It's worth a listen even if you dislike Cummins (as I do).

 

[C R]

Yes he would say that. If you listen to the full interview he sets out his case as to why it is and why it's unlikely that anyone can do anything about it within the current structures we have. He speculates that Farage won't have much success (if he is elected) unless he spends the time before the next election in spelling out a plan and recruiting the right people to implement it. It remains to be seen if he has the will and the energy required to be an effective prime minister. Probably unlikely, in which case Cummins predicts the total collapse of the existing order and the emergence of new parties. It's worth a listen even if you dislike Cummins (as I do).

I would say that pretty much all of that is self evident.

 

[CXRAndy]

The British lads are just doing what the French police are doing. Except rather more successful.

That's where the embarrassment comes from.

Send more British men to help these hero's


View: https://x.com/i/status/2006862128855023806

 

[Shortfall]

I would say that pretty much all of that is self evident.

If it's self evident then why have so many Prime Ministers entered Number 10 thinking that winning the election was the hard part and a!l they then had to do was roll out their program tor government to huge success?

 

[C R]

If it's self evident then why have so many Prime Ministers entered Number 10 thinking that winning the election was the hard part and a!l they then had to do was roll out their program tor government to huge success?

Probably because it would require turning on the people that fund them.

 

[Shortfall]

Probably because it would require turning on the people that fund them.

There's a lot in that. The case that Cummins makes however is that the current structures simply don't work and are the reason why successive governments have become paralysed and departments like the NHS and Defence are just massive sink holes of spending that can't deliver despite the colossal sums going into them.