Why 9 countries do have nuclear weapons is open to conjecture and doesn't prove that they are safer than those who do not have nuclear weapons.
You are simply being a pedantic dipshit who is annoyed that he isn't winning his point.
Given that we cannot know which is safer, the 186 without or 9 with, the majority would seem to be the key indicator.
It must be remembered that the US negotiators are/were Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner.
Steve Witkoff - A real estate guy.
Jared Kushner - Donnie's son in law.
Obviously the top team and Middle East experts.
Obviously the top team and Middle East experts.
Not quite, Melania wasn’t there to do her thing…
I agree and additionally Trűmp does not seem to appreciate the complexity of these agreements. Far more involved than "OK, we'll do what you want" (eg as "what you want needs to be clearly specified,"). Also what US will be assuring in return needs defining to the point to having some degree it won't be torn-up a few days later.I read somewhere that the reason that Oman intervened shortly before the strikes was because they feared that the US negotiators were simply out of their depth and not understanding what was being negotiated/proposed. Given the incompetence that seems to be a requirement to be a member of Team Trump, it sounds highly plausible. Of course, it's also possible that the negotiations were simply a smokescreen in the run up to a planned assault. As with all these wreckers (including Johnson & Frost etc from 2019), if you can wreck deliberately or by incompentence, it doesn't really matter, as the wrecking is the objective, and it doesn't really matter how you achieve it.
Trűmp does not understand complexity.
Worth noting that Ukraine is pushing forward addressing the corruption from its past whereas Russia offers Witkoff/Trűmp/Kushner "business opportunities".Would that be the Witkoff who's travelled to Russia multiple times but not once to Ukraine? That one??
key indicator of what?
Thanks for agreeing.You have provided any evidence to support the greens claim.
It does, but if the concepts are too complicated I can't help you.Not a single thing you have posted supports the claim that countries without nuclear weapons are safer than those with it.
No I didn't.You have however said its not possible to prove it either way.
No I didn't.Now you are contradicting yourself by claiming you've proved something you said can't be proved either way.
safety - pay attention!