untroubled by awkward questions about rhetoric, agency, action
And what are those "awkward questions about rhetoric, agency and action"? Are you going to tell us, or was it just glib meaningless bluster on your part.
You think Starmer has agency?????? I've just shât myself laughing. Action? What do you expect the leader of the opposition to do? Threaten Netanyahu with a forensic question?
Literally anything coming from the mouth of an opposition leader in any country WRT to Israel is rhetoric because they have no agency, and therefore there can be no action.
, and how we got to a place where a genocidal rogue state has 120 Friends on the opposition benches who are now all a bit upset by the and must plead earnestly with the killers to investigate themselves.
Make your mind up. A while back it was Starmer was facing rebellion from all his MPs because he was only calling for a "pause". Now that he has called for immediate ceasefire and two-state solution you are claiming* those MPs are suddenly Zionists
(see....we can all play the misrepresentation game for dramatic effect
)*
So let's hear it then, Oh Grand Cogniscenti! Please tell us what words Starmer should have used and what actions he should have taken.
Tick tock.