D
Deleted member 49
Guest
Touchy It wasn't really aimed at you.I didn't lose if you read my post.
But as @Beebo says it seems odd on a purely legal basis. But, you know, 12 Angry men and all that....
Touchy It wasn't really aimed at you.I didn't lose if you read my post.
But as @Beebo says it seems odd on a purely legal basis. But, you know, 12 Angry men and all that....
I'm not sure Marx was into buying and selling slaves ?Still, we can now get to work on anything commemorating Marx, he doesn't appear to have anything on the credit side ...
I didn't lose if you read my post.
But as @Beebo says it seems odd on a purely legal basis. But, you know, 12 Angry men and all that....
I don't think it's despite the evidence so much as deciding that the evidence shows that the greater good was served.Just occasionally a jury are so exorcised that they acquit in spite of the evidence. This is one, the trial of Clive Ponting for leaking stuff around the Falklands war was another.
More examples here:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...r-picture-activists-who-were-cleared-in-court
Apart from an impressive body of philosophical writings which still inform political thought today. On the downside, Steve Bannon has claimed to be a Marxist, but you can hardly blame our Karl for that.Still, we can now get to work on anything commemorating Marx, he doesn't appear to have anything on the credit side ...
Yea but is he actually a "Woke,Leftist,Marxist" ?Apart from an impressive body of philosophical writings which still inform political thought today. On the downside, Steve Bannon has claimed to be a Marxist, but you can hardly blame our Karl for that.
Oh! Apols :-)Touchy It wasn't really aimed at you.
No need....prefer you when your angry 😡Oh! Apols :-)
Bannon's just trolling us, just like the people who claim Hitler was a socialist are.On the downside, Steve Bannon has claimed to be a Marxist, but you can hardly blame our Karl for that.
Who? Our Karl?Yea but is he actually a "Woke,Leftist,Marxist" ?
What time?Is not in the papers today but this will be news to you all.
I'm having mussels with a crusty batton for my evening meal.
I heard an interview with David Olusoga, who was an expert witness in the court.I don't think it's despite the evidence so much as deciding that the evidence shows that the greater good was served.
Just occasionally a jury are so exorcised that they acquit in spite of the evidence. This is one, the trial of Clive Ponting for leaking stuff around the Falklands war was another.
More examples here:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...r-picture-activists-who-were-cleared-in-court