The NCAP Soccerball Thread

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Beebo

Legendary Member
Tony Blair’s at a loose end I believe..

Starmer like his footie.
 

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Yeah but I think to unite Africa and the Americas etc. Europe needs to propose a non-European. Europe is seen as a bit of an Old Boys club. After all originally the FA was the original ruling body.

Could they find a white South African with a lot of money to unite the game, as obviously Trump wouldn't agree to someone black.

Though I'd propose a black African woman, maybe from a 'shithole' country Trump has referenced, just to piss him off.

Second thoughts, does Michelle Obama like football?
 

secretsqirrel

spiteful class warrior

Yeah but Donny will look at the picture and go back to needing Greenland*.

1786469632139.jpeg



*Greenland not allowed membership as they only have astro turf, even tho’ their pitches are in very picturesque locations.
 

First Aspect

Legendary Member
Elon Musk now owns the moon. Surely he gets a vote? What about Mar a Lago? Isn't that an independent country? So two votes right there.

Seriously. I suspect Infantino is a gonner. Sepp Blatter was reelected shortly before he resigned, and I think UECA et al. will keep their foot on Infantino's throat even if he's re-elected. They do after all have all of the pre-FIFA source material on him, when he worked under well known ethical football administrator Michele Platini.

However, I think there will be a non European candidate put up before March from Canada or the Middle East. Likely the former. As soon as that person gets UEFA and CONCACAF (or other relevant home federation), and they make promises to support lots of small federations, with some personal bribes and one or two new pitches, Infantino's support will evaporate.
 

midlandsgrimpeur

Prostrate Member
Is Astroturf a country? Could it vote for Infantino?

It will be if Trump gets his way!
 

midlandsgrimpeur

Prostrate Member
Elon Musk now owns the moon. Surely he gets a vote? What about Mar a Lago? Isn't that an independent country? So two votes right there.

Seriously. I suspect Infantino is a gonner. Sepp Blatter was reelected shortly before he resigned, and I think UECA et al. will keep their foot on Infantino's throat even if he's re-elected. They do after all have all of the pre-FIFA source material on him, when he worked under well known ethical football administrator Michele Platini.

However, I think there will be a non European candidate put up before March from Canada or the Middle East. Likely the former. As soon as that person gets UEFA and CONCACAF (or other relevant home federation), and they make promises to support lots of small federations, with some personal bribes and one or two new pitches, Infantino's support will evaporate.

Yes, seems like he is done. I suspect he thinks he will ride it out but he has little hope by the looks of it.
 

Pblakeney

Shaman
Could they find a white South African with a lot of money to unite the game, as obviously Trump wouldn't agree to someone black.

Though I'd propose a black African woman, maybe from a 'shithole' country Trump has referenced, just to piss him off.

Second thoughts, does Michelle Obama like football?

Who cares what Dementia Donnie thinks?
He has zero say in the matter. That won't stop him talking obviously, but he is irrelevant. I'd really like someone to tell him that.
 

Psamathe

Legendary Member
As soon as that person gets UEFA and CONCACAF (or other relevant home federation), and they make promises to support lots of small federations, with some personal bribes and one or two new pitches, Infantino's support will evaporate.
That's an interesting aspect. Those who might benefit from Infant's giving more funds to less wealthy football associations seem to be considering their choice on the assumption that Infant's replacement wouldn't give them such funding. But if they were given the choice of same funding but without eg awarding Trump peace prizes, without wanting to sell off the game, etc. might they choice be to replace Infant?
 

Cirrus

Well-Known Member
That's an interesting aspect. Those who might benefit from Infant's giving more funds to less wealthy football associations seem to be considering their choice on the assumption that Infant's replacement wouldn't give them such funding. But if they were given the choice of same funding but without eg awarding Trump peace prizes, without wanting to sell off the game, etc. might they choice be to replace Infant?

I doubt the funds will/would end up benefiting the grassroots, the whole thing is corrupt, they will line their own pockets.
 
Top Bottom