Trolls kill forums

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Mr Celine

Senior Member
See, a real troll would either state that

1) locomotive serial numbers are daft
2) that they've been incorrectly numbered...

Well what kind of number is this?
unnamed.jpg
My favourite loco and it only has two letters and one digit?
 

CXRAndy

Guru
Aw, you’ve just informed him that he is wasting his time. Wonder what he’ll do to compensate.

It matters not, if you read or dont

:okay:
 

Mad Doug Biker

Just plodding along as always.
Well what kind of number is this?
View attachment 8656 My favourite loco and it only has two letters and one digit?

That was the second 'Deltic Prototype'*, hence the 'DP' and the number.

That said, I think it actually had a class 50 engine, despite the 'Deltic' (class 55) bodyshell.

It was written off in an accident at... Thirsk... I think, in 1967.
Someone on the main forum once claimed to have been on that very train as a kid, but I can't remember who it was now.


*Edit: Development Prototype, even.
 
Last edited:

Mr Celine

Senior Member
That was the second 'Deltic' Prototype, hence the 'DP' and the number.

That said, I think it actually had a class 50 engine, despite the 'Deltic' (class 55) bodyshell.

It was written off in an accident at... Thirsk... I think, in 1967.
Someone on the forum once claimed to have been on that very train as a kid, but I can't remember who it was now.

That would have been me.

DP2 was English Electric's Development Prototype 2. Their DP1 was the original Deltic, though it never carried that number.
 

Mad Doug Biker

Just plodding along as always.
That would have been me.
I did wonder, hence why I brought it up.

What do you remember of it, if you don't mind me asking?
DP2 was English Electric's Development Prototype 2. Their DP1 was the original Deltic, though it never carried that number.
To be fair, the original Deltic had such a nice paintjob that everyone knew what it was anyway.
 
I have noticed the distinct absence of the magatroll from the discussion about him.

Yes, he never responds to any mention of it which suggests a level of self awareness usually absent from a troll. This might lead one to suspect (along with the completely sensible posting on CC) that it may well be a bit of an act, in part at least.
 

First Aspect

Well-Known Member
Yes, he never responds to any mention of it which suggests a level of self awareness usually absent from a troll. This might lead one to suspect (along with the completely sensible posting on CC) that it may well be a bit of an act, in part at least.

I don't think the lack of self awareness is an act.
 
Top Bottom