Twitter under Musk....

AuroraSaab

Über Member
He's still so famous it's a big scoop for any TV show/pod cast etc to have him on, I suppose. He just seems unwell and it's an unkindness to give him any kind of platform at the moment.
 

albion

Well-Known Member
A positive, though it likely makes for slow growing.
https://fortune.com/2022/11/28/mastodon-social-ceo-eugen-rochko-twitter-elon-musk/amp/

There, Stephen Fry is getting closer to 100,000 followers.
 

stowie

Active Member
Twitter appears to have become the Elon Musk SPEKE YOUR BRAINZ show.

Although slightly interesting to see Kayne West unbanned and then banned again in quick succession after he goes "full Nazi". Clearly this Elon Musk "free-speech" schtick has some limitations much to the chagrin of his new alt-right fan-boys who thought he was ushering in a new era of "say what you like with no consequences".
 

dutchguylivingintheuk

Well-Known Member
Twitter appears to have become the Elon Musk SPEKE YOUR BRAINZ show.

Although slightly interesting to see Kayne West unbanned and then banned again in quick succession after he goes "full Nazi". Clearly this Elon Musk "free-speech" schtick has some limitations much to the chagrin of his new alt-right fan-boys who thought he was ushering in a new era of "say what you like with no consequences".
He never said that it was ''unlimited free speech'' maybe that's some left wing media's take on it be he never said it. He wanted to balance the bias, last week he retweeted an journalist who came with ''the twitter files'' exposing that the then twitter management played in cooperation with the democrats to play down the amount of traction/attention the story about Biden's son and the shoot found on his laptop got. Ironically not Trump's made up voter fraud but the way that story was held down had argument ally more effect on the us election outcome
It also made clear how much was done without (seeking) permission and/or knowledge from then ceo Jack Dorsey, so his apologies' after Musk mass sackings might have something to do with that.
Also an very interesting argument from the democrats was that freedom of speech apparently isn't absolute if you can suppress it to win elections that's apparently fine.

But i understand those tweets didn't get any attention here, it wasn't negative towards Musk..
 

dutchguylivingintheuk

Well-Known Member
You mean the shoot that no one has seen on laptop that there is no evidence to prove belonged to biden, ie qanon bullshit?
No it was called russian disinfo, however no evidence is ever delivered and on contrary they relied on former officials to make it sound more credible.
Here for example https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276 same article is post many times on other sites, however if you read the full pdf where they based their ''findings'' on here https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000 you see they say nothing the article claims, they say with many many words that it might look like russian help, but also ''They don't known where the emails come from. It than goes has 5 pages with list of those who signed it and goes back to the 2016 elections but that is off course not relevant. The source of how the laptop was obtained was already known, it was just a diversion.

Furthermore there is evidence the laptop belonged to Biden, he worked in a office just behind that laptop shop, it was also dropped off under the name of that charity/company and after repeated request it was not collected or payed for, which by both American and European laws means the laptop becomes the ownership of the shop. Who then alerted media when he found what was on it emails and pictures from no other than Bidens son just to be clear.(nodoubtly there was some financial gain form him in it)


So no hacking, no Russian collusion just lazyness and carelessness.
 

icowden

Über Member
Oh and for everyone who want to read it, below is the whole thread with all the findings about how the use democrats manipulated the news about Biden's son's laptop.
And all this to prevent the leaking of some dick picks.
 

dutchguylivingintheuk

Well-Known Member
And all this to prevent the leaking of some dick picks.
If only, the contents of the email is far more interesting an concerning as is how the democrats used their influence within twitter to falsely effectively censor information. It's also concludes that both democrats and republicans have the same tools but it still for more democrats biased..(something else then a dull survey from the source itself), and off course like i said before, it has had fore more likely had an effect on the outcome of the elections then Trumps wild claims about voter fraud.
 

icowden

Über Member
If only, the contents of the email is far more interesting an concerning as is how the democrats used their influence within twitter to falsely effectively censor information.
Yes. They requested that pictures of Hunter Biden's appendage were removed / not posted. This is not an unreasonable request.
 

dutchguylivingintheuk

Well-Known Member
Yes. They requested that pictures of Hunter Biden's appendage were removed / not posted. This is not an unreasonable request.
Suuuree, i hope you don't believe that yourself do you? It was about the emails an all the other shady dealings, pictures of him taking cocaine etc. But even if it was about the pictures, without it being uncovered like this, we would have never known. And surely if it was public i wouldn't really be that interested in seeing those pictures, however i don't think the choice to see those pictures should be with the leadership of a political party who argument ally gained from the fact their request was honored.
If anyone should decide those pictures emails etc. shouldn't be published it should have been a court.

EDIT: see number 16 and 17 of that twitter thread, it says it was about the whole article which had his focus on the email in the freaking title, so i don't known how you can spin that into ''only wanted to remove some pictures''
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom