Gender again. Sorry!

[CXRAndy]

This fella absolutely nails the point.

View: https://x.com/i/status/2012961325211668874

Why those who use gender will never admit they're wrong

 

[CXRAndy]

View: https://x.com/i/status/2013242157411213459

 

[monkers]

My views on 3rd spaces have been given many times in this thread. What we're seeing now is linguistic gymnastics so we can provide a platform to be mansplained why men with a GRC are supposedly still entitled to access women's spaces.

I haven't noticed anybody say such a thing in this recent conversation. The conversation is to do with the Darlington nurses, and no person has posted either that Rose Henderson has a GRC, or that Rose Henderson is judged by the tribunal to be lawfully permitted to use that space.

You have the opportunity to answer a simple straightforward question about three marked doors - women only changing, men only changing, communal changing. Does one of the three marked doors meet your needs? Yes or no will suffice, but embellishment welcome.

 

[CXRAndy]

The NHS is captured with trans ideology, tried to railroad the women into accepting males in female changing areas.


View: https://x.com/i/status/2013241889751810521

 

[AuroraSaab]

I haven't noticed anybody say such a thing in this recent conversation. The conversation is to do with the Darlington nurses, and no person has posted either that Rose Henderson has a GRC, or that Rose Henderson is judged by the tribunal to be lawfully permitted to use that space.

You have the opportunity to answer a simple straightforward question about three marked doors - women only changing, men only changing, communal changing. Does one of the three marked doors meet your needs? Yes or no will suffice, but embellishment welcome.

Third spaces. Fill your boots. You just want a platform to tell us all why you're entitled to go in the women's changing rooms even when there's a mixed sex option. I don't know why you just don't get on with telling us and stop wasting our time with a repetitive bad faith question.

https://ncap.cyclechat.net/search/1...c[thread]=273&c[users]=AuroraSaab&o=relevance

 

[monkers]

Third spaces. Fill your boots. You just want a platform to tell us all why you're entitled to go in the women's changing rooms even when there's a mixed sex option. I don't know why you just don't get on with telling us and stop wasting our time with a repetitive bad faith question.

https://ncap.cyclechat.net/search/1...c[thread]=273&c[users]=AuroraSaab&o=relevance

Sounds like paranoia setting in. It was a straightforward question about the wording on the doors, nothing bad faith about it. If the answer had been ''yes'' then I would have said that such a set up would have made the Darlington policy workable, and pointed out this would establish that the failure was not the policy but the implementation. That was only only point I was hoping we could then find agreement on.

 

[CXRAndy]

It was a policy decision not to provide 'other' for Tims. Nothing to do with failure to implement.

The NHS as like so many organisations are still wilfully ignoring Supreme Court and tribunal decisions.

It has nothing to do with government stalling guidance either.