That cartoon depicts icow and AS's panic-mongering that self-ID will lead to men, who fully resemble men, exposing their genitalia to women in women's spaces and anybody complaining will be prosecuted for discriminatory behaviour.
It doesn't matter what they look like.
The cartoon suggests prosecution. I've never said it. What I have said is that self ID means an end to single sex spaces: changing rooms, rape crisis centres, sports for women, intimate care provision, refuges, prisons, hospitals wards. Because under self ID women will no longer be able to ask for a male bodied person to be removed, whether a transwoman or other male.
Firstly, and most importantly, that possibility that men would do this would already be in evidence in the 40 countries with Self ID, and we'd know all about it from AS. The fact that she is silent on this should tell you something.
It's in evidence. I have posted plenty of stuff about jails and sports but you pretend it isn't happening. And when you acknowledge it's happening it doesn't matter because it's not frequently enough for you, or in say sports transwomen don't win every single competition they enter.
Secondly, there is an assumption that there is a law in place that would lead to the woman being prosecuted, and that the law is so inflexible that it would not allow for the possibility of indecent exposure.
There are plenty of laws that deal with stuff after it has happened. But that doesn't mean we do away with the regulations that help prevent them.
You can be prosecuted for stabbing someone with a knife. We still have regulations about selling knives to under 21 year old in order to minimise risk.
What you really want is every women's space to be open to men. You refuse to explain what it is about transwomen that means we should treat them differently than other men.
