It mentions 2 in the headline. As to the rest, I have no idea what you are talking about. As usual. I said none of that though. All the athletes with the 5-ard dsd are biological males. They have previously been allowed to run, but can now only run in events over 400m because it has, for unfathomable reasons, been decreed that they only have unfair advantage in higher distances.
One of the runners in the article, Margaret Wambui, has even suggested a third category for dsd athletes:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/sport/africa/57239439.amp
We all know what a woman is. This ridiculous game of pretending noone knows it's biological material reality is simply a way of trying to undermine provision for women by suggesting anyone can be a woman because 'What's a woman??? Nobody knows!! It's a mystery! We can all be women!'
Asking 'What is a woman?' isn't a test of knowledge. It's a test of who is prepared to lie.
All mammals have developed to have bodies that produce either big gametes or small ones. Hence, two sexes. There are dozens of different dsds. Does that mean there are dozens of different sexes? No, of course not. There are two sexes with occasional variation in development.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/understanding-the-sex-binary
Appropriating the difficulties of people with dsds - some of which have serious medical implications - in order to justify including men who don't have a dsd in the female sports category is in poor taste.
'Some people have medical conditions, therefore men without a medical condition can be in women's sports, changing rooms, refuges.....'
Dsd folk are just useful to be exploited to the benefit of those without a dsd it seems.
