monkers
Legendary Member
What this graphic shows is that you are a cave man - 'full blooded male'. Laughing my arse off - a real man doesn't go around beating his chest going Ug, me big hard man. What a tosser you are.
She is still a woman. Like a female who loses a leg, she is still a female.
Male who loses his testicles to cancer is still a male
It's not 'my graph'. In fact it's not a graph at all. Nor does it set out to show bimodal sex. So what is it? It's an example of what the model of bimodality looks like. Should have been obvious.
Their sex hasn't changed. Body modifications, whether by drugs or surgery are simply that.Trans man with top surgery, a surgically constructed penis, and testosterone leading to a male sounding voice, facial hair, and 'guns'. My assessment: a man, just not a cisgender man, but a man nonetheless. Why? Because like a woman, a man has the right to live their life without interference from others.
If sex is bimodal, it would map on to that example of a model of bimodality surely?
So map it on for us.
What are the points on the x axis as pertaining to sex? What are the points on the y axis? What are the differences between someone born at different points in the shaded areas (which presumably represent male and female)?
You said testosterone doesn't make you aggressive. Now it does if you're male. Which is it
Have you seen those trans who claim to be women, betray their real origins when confronted with questions
Depends on the levels. I've seen men in gyms super super aggressive. They were taking testosterone supplement
Were they more 'full blooded' than you?
Are you really so farking stupid? It's presented as an example of a bimodal model. The fact that intersex people exist is sufficient to show that they reside in area 'C' on the model. That's it.
I've enough testosterone, I'm bald
As usual you are resorting to abuse to deflect from answering. If it shows a bimodal model, map sex on to it. Explain what each axis represents in relation to being male or female.
People with dsds aren't half male-half female by the way, as your image suggests. It's very insulting to suggest they are some sort of male/female hybrid. They are either male or female, with a medical condition that has affected their development in utero.
Because you are being deliberately obtuse.
There was no claim that this was representative of the exact shape of the bimodal graph of human sex. It was clearly an example of bimodality.
But as usual you try every way you can to discredit both me and it - which is a twofold system of abuse.
You can not be disingenuous without being called out - and that's why you are farking stupid, because you won't learn this.