Gender again. Sorry!

[classic33]

What an angry man you are. You're not really selling me the idea of giving men access to women's spaces one bit.

They aren't legally men though, are they?
Whatever you may think.

This is just your usual unevidenced rubbish.

I wouldn't say that. Something about a different group frightens you, and you're projecting that fear in an attempt to make it real. It's all you've done, all along.

It must be apparent by now that on this forum nobody gives a toss what anybody else thinks of them, [B[least of all what you think.[/B] How odd that you imagine women care about your approval though.

I wouldn't say that,

Unless you explain what this means - which you've declined to do several times - I think we can only assume it refers to the only relevant acronym I could find, which is 'Male Gay Girlfriend', suggesting that my partner is actually a gay man. Seems a bit homophobic of you to continue using it as what you imagine to be an insult tbh but crack on. I don't care, he won't care, and it's only you that thinks being gay is something to be embarrassed about to point where it can be used as an insult.

It seems to be working here. Playing the victim yet again, and your paranoia showing yet again.

You've only demanded an answer once before. I've already said if you get it right...
However you continue to play the victim, a role you've grown used to.

 

[Deleted member 159]

They're biologically male, always will be, can never change

 

[Deleted member 159]

Is it so awful to enlighten us to your acronyms?

Not seen any victim claiming. Last one was Monkers, she skipped off, to be replaced her alter ego.

Probably sunning herself in the south of France

 

[Deleted member 121]

Is it so awful to enlighten us to your acronyms?

Not seen any victim claiming. Last one was Monkers, she skipped off, to be replaced her alter ego.

Probably sunning herself in the south of France

Monkers last post was at 14:16. You posted at 18:38 ish. Any tips on how to go from drowning in piss on NACA to getting my tits out on a beach in the south of France in a few hours and in dark conditions?

 

[bobzmyunkle]

Any tips on how to go from drowning in piss on NACA to getting my tits out on a beach in the south of France in a few hours and in dark conditions?

They've got t'interweb in France. They call it l'interweb.

 

[AndyRM]

They've got t'interweb in France. They call it l'interweb.

Depends if it's on strike or not.

 

[Deleted member 159]

Monkers last post was at 14:16. You posted at 18:38 ish. Any tips on how to go from drowning in piss on NACA to getting my tits out on a beach in the south of France in a few hours and in dark conditions?

Was that Monker's, or her alter persona?

 

[monkers]

Was that Monker's, or her alter persona?

The posts began with 'N again'. You couldn't find your way to Specsavers!

 

[Deleted member 159]

Transgender effectively banned from women's Olympic competitions from this summer

Only those who have transitioned before 12 years old would be considered eligible.

Given most countries are recoiling from the barbaric child multilation practices, no one will male ever be able to cheat in women's Olympic sports again.

Hooray

 

[AndyRM]

This came into effect in March... Keep up.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/65051900

Puberty can begin a lot earlier than 12, so they're going to have a hard time with that one.

As for "barbaric child mutilation", what about circumcision? Non-consensual and totally unnecessary.

 

[Deleted member 159]

As for "barbaric child mutilation", what about circumcision? Non-consensual and totally unnecessary.

Totally agree, same for female genital mutilation- totally barbaric practices that should have some of the severest punishment to the perpetrators

 

[AndyRM]

Punish doctors? Great idea.

 

[Deleted member 159]

Punish doctors? Great idea.

the vast majority of these practices are not undertaken by 'doctors'. Most are an elder 'religious' practitioner, who undertakes the mutilation.

However if doctors undertook these practices without definite required intervention due to physical issues, sure punish them too.

 

[icowden]

As for "barbaric child mutilation", what about circumcision? Non-consensual and totally unnecessary.

Not always.

 

[AndyRM]

Not always.

Well yeah, I figured I didn't have to spell that out.

But so what?

Other than serious medical conditions there's no sane reason for lopping off a foreskin. Especially not that of a minor.