Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

multitool

Guest
The concern is that some more deviant men may take the guise of a transwoman in order to access female spaces for nefarious purposes.

Not this crap again. There is no evidence of this happening.

There is evidence of men, cis men, not needing to pretend to be a woman in order to commit sex crimes.

This is you casting trans women as deviant aggressors, whilst ignoring the actual problems women face.
 
Last edited:

monkers

Squire
That simply isn't true. Anybody can say they are transitioning and have protection under the EA. Very few people call themselves crossdressers, for obvious reasons. You don't have to tell anybody, never mind inform your GP.

https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/equality/equality-act-2010/your-rights-under-equality-act-2010/gender-reassignment-discrimination#:~:text=In the Equality Act, gender,sex to your preferred gender.

... which is 'transgender with a GRC' and 'transgender without a GRC'. Not 'only the GRC ones are transgender'.


Because you flip flop on this so often it must make you dizzy. 'You are who you say you are/gender identity is innate' has become 'only trans with a GRC/the word is problematic'.

The fact is this new double standard of genuine transwomen vs crossdressers is the only way you can reconcile the number of transwomen offenders.

You still haven't explained how we are supposed to tell the difference.

Your stupidity is wearing. I have not flip -flopped. I am consistent.
 

monkers

Squire
So all those who don't go through with surgery are cross dressers.

This works, by the phrase, meaning men wearing women's clothing, or women wearing men's.

Everyone then knows straight off

:okay:

Oh FFS.

This thread is just a place for morons to hang out and infuriate those people who are not restricted to the limitation of two damaged brain cells in random orbits in danger of collision.
 
Not this crap again. There is no evidence of this happening. There is evidence of men, cis men, not needing to pretend to be a woman in order to commit sex crimes. This is you casting trans women as deviant aggressors, whilst ignoring the actual problems women face.
The actual problem is men, regardless of how they identify. We overcome this problem by having single sex spaces for women and girls.
 
D

Deleted member 121

Guest


2fwww.cooltoyreview.com%2f2012TF%2fNECA%2fIMG_7370.jpg
 
D

Deleted member 121

Guest
I'm happy for you- everybody should have a hobby.

With lifes commitments and NCAP not a chance. Also I can't text and shīt like Andy.
 

icowden

Squire
Not this crap again. There is no evidence of this happening.
There is evidence of men, cis men, not needing to pretend to be a woman in order to commit sex crimes.
This is you casting trans women as deviant aggressors, whilst ignoring the actual problems women face.
So you genuinely believe that Isla Bryson, Zara Jade, Scarlet Blake and other men who have decided that actually they are women either before of after committing horrific crimes genuinely believe that they are women and are seeking to change gender?

You really don't think that there is a *tiny* chance that they are men who would rather be in a woman's prison, and if it it takes a wig, some lippy and a name change are willing to give it a punt?
https://insidetime.org/newsround/so...ose ages ranged,years before coming to prison.

The finding regarding “fakers” echoes a letter in July’s issue of Inside Time from a serving trans woman prisoner, Gemma Smith of HMP Dartmoor, who wrote: “Sadly, there are people who use being transgender as a tool. Some sex offenders used to say they were transgender as they believed it lowered risk and made them exempt from courses, and also in the hope they would be placed in the female estate … It is just unfortunate that people jump on the transgender bandwagon for personal gain – it makes genuine people look bad.”
 
The actual problem is men, regardless of how they identify. We overcome this problem by having single sex spaces for women and girls.
All these grand speeches about the safety of women, nowt but cheap words. When the occasion suits you.

You forgotten that you were the one who said that Olive Smelt was partly to blame for being attacked by Peter Sutcliffe, with a hammer. For simply being in a pub, after finishing work, and before walking through the town centre to get home. As she'd done countless times before.

Officially she "survived' the attack, if you call having your brain driven in surviving.
 
Top Bottom