That's not what I was pointing out. Have you not noticed that these paedo men all have something in common?
Have a look. It can't be a coincidence.
That's what we've been saying these men are now using trans as a gateway to access women and girls
Deviants the lot of them
Women and girls should be at all costs protected in their safe spaces. Why you cant acknowledge this is baffling
Haven't got time, explain. I'll be back later today
That's one way to admit you've got the attention span of a goldfish.
It was not just a ''crossbow guy'' but an revengefull ex. an important difference, but to be honest i think it's a bit cheap to drag current events in. I'm regularly in Bushey(the village where this happened) and i can tell you people are devastated but hey, don't let that stop you from making an point right? (pointless too)
Wow. That's a long list of men. What a lot of men. So many males!Just 5 examples, but there are pages of them:
https://www.google.com/search?q=andy+paedophile&client=ms-android-samsung-rvo1&sca_esv=871f167eb5c7f3d4&sca_upv=1&source=android-browser&sxsrf=ADLYWIISG0DcxoQ1-5XZ6NUbesFclRmGLw:1720763290443&ei=msOQZtHkGpHBhbIP0emZ-Ak&oq=andy+paedophile&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIg9hbmR5IHBhZWRvcGhpbGVIlRxQ1BBYvxlwAXgBkAEAmAHFAaAB5QSqAQMwLjS4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgGgAgzCAgoQABiwAxjWBBhHmAMAiAYBkAYIkgcBMaAHtAE&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp#ip=1
Definite pattern, and so many examples that the name must be a red flag as potential child abuser.
That's not what I was pointing out. Have you not noticed that these paedo men all have something in common?
Have a look. It can't be a coincidence.
The point, which is absolutely correct, is that men are the real threat to women (and society in general), far more regularly than anyone trans.
Yes, it's men, regardless of their name or how they identify.
'Anyone trans' remains the sex they were born.
Unless you can show that something magical takes place when someone utters the words 'I'm trans now' there is no justification to treat trans people as any different to others of the same sex in situations where sex is relevant, ie single sex spaces/services and safeguarding.
Unisex spaces are far less safe for women and girls than single sex ones. We are know this, stats prove it.Weird how nobody is getting murdered in toilets or changing rooms where men can just walk in. Almost as if it's completely missing the point and is a total red-herring.
It will keep the demographic who comit most sex offences - men - away from the demographic who are mostly the victims - women.Attempting to ban TW from changing rooms and toilets will do nothing to further the safety of women. Absolutely nothing. All it does is indulges a handful of bigots.
I'm on holiday. I interrupted it only to laugh at you listing a load of male sex offenders and thinking it's an argument for letting men in women's spaces.Nice to see you back, Aurora. Hope you recovered from the absolute hammering you took last weekend
That's because of opportunity and ease of access to the victim. You want to give a subset of men access that they otherwise wouldn't have.The absolute, undeniable, overwhelming majority of violence towards women takes place in a domestic setting.
If they just want to pee they can go pee in the Men's can't they then? You keep telling us only a tiny number of people care so a trans identified man will be absolutely fine in the Men's toilets and changing rooms with you and all the other welcoming men.But here's Aurora wanging on about a TW having a piss in a cubicle
It's not really just about toilets or being murdered as you know.