Gender again. Sorry!

[monkers]

That's one way of outing yourself as at least bi-curious I suppose.

''Bike Urious'' would make a good user name for someone here perhaps?

 

[Stevo 666]

Oh just fark off.

Just more repetition of the same shoot over and over.

I'm more than tired of reading the same tired arguments and controlling behaviour. You aren't interested in information or discussion just unceasing vilification of a minority group who pose no threat to you.

Go fark yourself, and now blocked. Bye forever you sad C.unt.

That's not really a sign of you winning the argument now, is it?

 

[AuroraSaab]

Funny how society managed to police it when women were excluded from sports, certain jobs, universities, or casting the vote.

 

[CXRAndy]

That's not really a sign of you winning the argument now, is it?

She never did, just got more and more angry, smashing up her bedsit with rage.

 

[CXRAndy]

The numbers don't lie- look at the parents for the issue


View: https://x.com/redpilldispensr/status/1910997450619265282?t=AVqkGIp_OR1u5M9IZhvuGA&s=19

 

[icowden]

The numbers don't lie- look at the parents for the issue

No - just the broadcaster.

Pansexual is broader definition of Bisexual for people who believe in multiple genders beyond male and female.
The term is new, the behaviour isn't.

Kary Burke did not mention the ages of her children. Her children are very unlikely to be 5 and 7 as stated.
She lives in California and is 57. That puts her youngest child as likely being 15 at the very youngest.

Is it really that surprising to have a child that swings all ways in California?

 

[monkers]

The love of antiques may not in itself make you gay, though it might make you buy curios.

 

[CXRAndy]

Is it really that surprising to have a child that swings all ways in California?

I'm not surprised at all, it's down to the parenting, nurture not nature. They are brainwashed into believing they can be anything

 

[AndyRM]

There's absolutely not a chance that my religious and conservative parents raised me to be pansexual.

I did live in LA for four years, so I guess that knackered my years spent on the unforgiving pews of churches in Scotland.

 

[CXRAndy]

I did live in LA for four years, so I guess that knackered my years spent on the unforgiving pews of churches in Scotland.

You were lucky you weren't captured by this lot

 

[AndyRM]

The irony of you posting a picture of furries in front of an anti-fascism monument is glorious.

 

[dutchguylivingintheuk]

We are considering what science says about any differences between trans women and natal women in sporting performance. Comparisons between natal men and natal women are not the consideration. The point I'm making is that handgrip strength is important to some sports, it isn't relevant to all sports, so why make it the parameter where it doesn't apply?

What we see in the numbers is female athletes who have transitioned later in life and there for first competed as men and then compete as female seem to have an big advantage, so my point is more should be done to create and balance, because now it unfair to biological women, whatever the causes may be.
And the very strong evidence suggest it's biological, the hard evidence is still lacking because biological men and women are easy to compare but people who have transitioned is much harder firstly due to the numbers being much lower secondly because there are so much more variables.
i don't know what your point about handgrip strenght is i think it much more the overal package to be honest.

Athletes with bold claims are nothing new. Could Fatima Whitbread take on any man when she is 71 - as good as she was I think it as unlikely as you. The point is though that she makes this claim while also making the claim that trans women do not belong in women's sport. So as I said ''go figure''. Two opposing bold claims without evidence from the same former athlete do not make compelling evidence that trans women can not compete in women's sport.

Amongst elederly generation i think it's often also a bit of refusing the idea as humanty in general has done for so long.

 

[CXRAndy]

so my point is more should be done to create and balance, because now it unfair to biological women, whatever the causes may be

No, men should not be allowed to compete in women's sport.

They have to accept that it is them who wanted to change their status. Taking a decision usually has some consequences, not being allowed into women's sport is one

 

[bobzmyunkle]

I do hope the judges have been following the NACA debate as part of their decision making.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/apr/16/uk-supreme-court-rule-legal-definition-woman

 

[AndyRM]

It's going to be interesting to see what the ruling is. And what happens if England decides they don't like it.