Gender again. Sorry!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
World boxing have announced mandatory testing for both male and females if they want to compete

Yes, but looks like Algeria will be allowed to do the testing on Khelife, which is madness. Should be an independent tester for all athletes. Khelife's camp claimed training at altitude accounted for genetic changes so I have no confidence in them being honest re results.

Why is something you're fond of telling others to do beyond your capabilities.

It's not but you're making the claim and your reluctance to post any evidence means we'll just have to file it under Classic's bizarre unsubstantiated weirdy stuff and in future ignore your obsessive ramblings.
 

classic33

Myself
It's not but you're making the claim and your reluctance to post any evidence means we'll just have to file it under Classic's bizarre unsubstantiated weirdy stuff and in future ignore your obsessive ramblings.
Dismiss it if you feel like it, but it's easy enough for you to check what you posted.
 

classic33

Myself
posting links to Twitter without commentary is not a discussion. It's trolling.
No account either, all I get is
Screenshot_20250531-121632.png
So I've no idea what was trying to be said.
 
It's a report on how the UK fares in protecting women and girls by Reem Alsalem, the UN special rapporteur for violence against women and girls. Amongst other things she says that at least a third of British forces were still collecting data based on criminals and victims’ self-identified gender rather than their sex.

It has led to a situation in which 49 convictions for rape had been officially listed as female in the decade to 2023, despite the fact they were biological men.

Archived version:

https://archive.md/fPnwK

It's important that data is recorded accurately. Women commit relatively few sexual crimes and recording male crimes in the female stats can skew the statistics. You can't talk meaningfully about violence against women and girls if you aren't recording accurate information.
 

monkers

Squire
It's a report on how the UK fares in protecting women and girls by Reem Alsalem, the UN special rapporteur for violence against women and girls. Amongst other things she says that at least a third of British forces were still collecting data based on criminals and victims’ self-identified gender rather than their sex.

It has led to a situation in which 49 convictions for rape had been officially listed as female in the decade to 2023, despite the fact they were biological men.

Archived version:

https://archive.md/fPnwK

It's important that data is recorded accurately. Women commit relatively few sexual crimes and recording male crimes in the female stats can skew the statistics. You can't talk meaningfully about violence against women and girls if you aren't recording accurate information.
Oh OK thanks, I have that report.
 

classic33

Myself
It's a report on how the UK fares in protecting women and girls by Reem Alsalem, the UN special rapporteur for violence against women and girls. Amongst other things she says that at least a third of British forces were still collecting data based on criminals and victims’ self-identified gender rather than their sex.

It has led to a situation in which 49 convictions for rape had been officially listed as female in the decade to 2023, despite the fact they were biological men.

Archived version:

https://archive.md/fPnwK

It's important that data is recorded accurately. Women commit relatively few sexual crimes and recording male crimes in the female stats can skew the statistics. You can't talk meaningfully about violence against women and girls if you aren't recording accurate information.
How did the law identify them though. If the law says they are/were women that's how it'd be recorded. Regardless of whether you agree with it or not.

Vicky Bevan?
And lets not forget the 84% increase in female perpetrated sexual assaults in the period between 2015 to 2019. Nor should we forget that 23 women were charged with providing children for underage sex. Not all of it with or men. That figure is growing as the investigation continues.
What sort of mother offers her daughter up for sex with a stranger.
 
How did the law identify them though. If the law says they are/were women that's how it'd be recorded. Regardless of whether you agree with it or not.
It's not based on what the law might say, ie GRC. They were recorded as what they self identified as at the time of arrest.

Vicky Bevan?
You have to go back to 2022 to find a female rapist? I bet I could find you 10 male ones from this month alone.

And lets not forget the 84% increase in female perpetrated sexual assaults in the period between 2015 to 2019.
Let's not forget that if there were 3 female rapists a year and then 6, that would be a 100% increase. It's also not surprising the numbers go up if men are being recorded as women is it? That's going to add to the increase in 'women' sexual offenders.
 
Last edited:

CXRAndy

Guru
How did the law identify them though. If the law says they are/were women that's how it'd be recorded.

Don't be so dumb, you know, I know, everyone knows they were male.

This stupid situation we have arrived at through ignoring basic biology

The law has been an ass, what an absolute crazy situation that a case had to go to the supreme court to clarify what is a female
 
Top Bottom