General Election 2024....

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Yes it does. Borrowing to fund the building of new schools, hospitals, and other infrastructure will cost the state less in the long run and lead to more economic activity.

Borrowing to replace current expenditure as a result of tax cuts for the wealthy will cost the state more in the long run.

Do tax cuts always have to be “for the wealthy”? How about increasing the personal allowance?
 

Ian H

Legendary Member
More innovative campaigning.

largan.JPG
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Yes it does. Borrowing to fund the building of new schools, hospitals, and other infrastructure will cost the state less in the long run and lead to more economic activity.

Borrowing to replace current expenditure as a result of tax cuts for the wealthy will cost the state more in the long run.

Spending on infrastructure, such as schools, hospitals is only an investment if they are then used to produce the desired outcomes (whatever that may be), otherwise they are just buildings
 
Yes it does. Borrowing to fund the building of new schools, hospitals, and other infrastructure will cost the state less in the long run and lead to more economic activity.
with the big *if* done properly otherwie it's just a other day in tory land

Borrowing to replace current expenditure as a result of tax cuts for the wealthy will cost the state more in the long run.
The current expenditure is not sustainable because the housing prices keep going up and considering benefits like housing benefit rise with rents that go up if housing prices go up, it's an vicious circle. the tory sollution is pile it all on one pile, sneakingly reduce it, and it will buy some time, but that's all it does. Which is perfect of you are a career politician, by the time it becomes a problem again it's somebody elses problem.

He’s a highly respected Professor of Economics and has taught at several top universities worldwide.
He indeed is
Tell me how he’s not a serious person?
His political views have nothing to do with is economic knowledge, as the political ideology is leading, he just uses his credentials a being a professor in economics to push a certain agenda.(and yes he is not always wrong he makes quite a few good points at times)
 

icowden

Legendary Member
Has @icowden been round to whinge about VAT on private school fees yet?
Sorry, I've been away narrowboating. TBH it doesn't affect me as my kids will have finished school if Starmer even succeeds in getting it through Parliament. I'll just enjoy the look on his face when the number of people suing the LEA for failing to provide suitable places for children with additional needs goes through the roof and the state sector goes into overdrive due to the lack of places for all of the children currently using private school as specialist provision.

It's not whinging - it's pointing out that not every child in a private school has parents who are Oligarchs or friends of Tory MPs. Labour usually fails to recognise that there is a bottom 15% or so of families who are paying or getting scholarships / bursaries etc because states schools do not have suitable provision for their children. The rich parents won't give a shoot about paying VAT, so pretending it's removing a tax break for the rich is largely bollocks.

I've stated before that if Labour really wanted to do away with private schools the route is massive investment in state schools - reducing class sizes and improving facilities.

Anyway, we've pretty much done this to death in the education thread.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Sorry, I've been away narrowboating. TBH it doesn't affect me as my kids will have finished school if Starmer even succeeds in getting it through Parliament. I'll just enjoy the look on his face when the number of people suing the LEA for failing to provide suitable places for children with additional needs goes through the roof and the state sector goes into overdrive due to the lack of places for all of the children currently using private school as specialist provision.

It's not whinging - it's pointing out that not every child in a private school has parents who are Oligarchs or friends of Tory MPs. Labour usually fails to recognise that there is a bottom 15% or so of families who are paying or getting scholarships / bursaries etc because states schools do not have suitable provision for their children. The rich parents won't give a shoot about paying VAT, so pretending it's removing a tax break for the rich is largely bollocks.

I've stated before that if Labour really wanted to do away with private schools the route is massive investment in state schools - reducing class sizes and improving facilities.

Anyway, we've pretty much done this to death in the education thread.

There is not going to be a problem, just received by election leaflet for local Labour MP:

- 6500 new teachers
- keep the triple lock for pensioners
- cut NHS waiting lists

All without increasing my income tax or VAT rate.

What’s not to like. 😊

Hope you enjoyed the narrowboating. It’s on my bucket list.
 
D

Deleted member 159

Guest
Spent a few times on canal and river boats. Probably the best holidays I've ever had. Something so beautiful getting up early in the morning, the mist hanging over the water, super slow pace of life
 
Top Bottom