dutchguylivingintheuk
Über Member
I don't known where you got your history lessons, it sounds cute, but it's wrong! There once was a man called Yasser Arafat who fought to get their part of a deal they previuosly rejected convinced that neighbours country would crush the isreali's a gamble they lost.You certainly seem to be dismissing, or at least ignoring, the full role Israel has played in destroying Palestine for its own gain. They’ve been doing it for decades and they are responsible for creation of Hamas which came into existence to retaliate against Israeli violence.
So not Hamas but Arafats movement was created to retaillte defend and rule their part of the country.
But like always you have movements that start like the one and then turn out to be the other, Hamas gained trust by starting as a charity helping the poor only to make those same poor even worse off once they got power.
A other way they got power is by promising the total destruction of Isreal in their handbook or founding pinciples.(it has been watered down now) They where in essence saying Arafat was to light, they where the real deal.
But yes Isreal especially under Netahnyahu has done his part,(in making matters worse) that's true, but the majority of the pages in this topic already talk about how bad Isreal is, why is it then they everytime i want to talk about how bad Hamas is one of you lot seems to be wanting to go back to ''Isreal bad'' Just as the continues repeats of ''Isreal can't without Western support'' that was absolutely true 30 years ago but it isn't now, surely no western support will hurt them / make their position weaker but so will it make western position weaker both in loss of supply of Israeli tech, intelligence and the fact that Iran will seize the opportunity, think the other side of the medal is both people can't have to nice leader, Rabin was murdered by one of his one because he was ''to nice'' Arafat wasn't murdered but defacto sidelined by a Hamas which was/is far more aggressive.