To me this in some respects highlights the use of (western) language to spin what is going on. Why are Hezbollah & Hamas "proxies for Iran"
Because Iran facilitated, provided weapons and coordinated the attacks on Isreal.
yet Israel is not referred to as a "proxy for the US"?
Because they aren't the US does supply them with weapons but truth be told, although many hear don't like it Isreal also supplies to western allies, in materials, knowledge etc. It's not like the ''syrian opposition'' the US funded under Obama
Iran is arming those they regard as allies but those allies are largely apparently making their own decisions,
widely disputed yes sure Hamas and friends and on the other side Hezbollah claim they all planned it on their own but there is evidence supporting otherwise with Iranian ''advisors'' being killed in places they shouldn't be if their role was mainly supplying equipment.
just as the US is arming and defending Israel though Israel is making its own decisions.
There is a lot more evidence suggesting Isreal is make it's own decisions, and considering they could listen in on Hezbollah for so long it makes you wonder how 7 October happened, it seems they where to comfortable
I'm not trying to defend any party to this madness, just how to me some politicians seem to be using language to spin how some regard parties to the conflict.
Ian
Language is always spinned in whatever way, if you look at english al-jazeera it will give you an different(and dishonest) view. but it is sometimes interesting to see, to help understand ''the other side''
The Iranians hoped to ''unite the arab world against the west'' they seemed to have forgotting they where also funding the houthi's bullying the Saudi's and now said Saudi's are on Isreal/the west side