Israel / Palestine

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Psamathe

Regular
We've seen lots of flag burnings and provocative behaviour during pro Palestinian demonstrations. Should other people take that as an invitation to violence? If you go down this route, there's never an end to it.
You are only partially quoting what I actually said
What is going on in Gaza and Lebanon is imensly important, particularly so to muslims so for a group to think they can walk around a foreign city shouting "let the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] win, we will fark the Arabs" and burning a Palestinian flag is just inviting what then went on to happen.
Add to the flag burning what was being shouted and who was doing the shouting. Then add an attack on a taxi in a city where maybe 10% of the population are muslim and is it really any surprise that what happened happened?

Looking for "Justification" is playing into the zero sum game and suggesting one group did "wrong" is not suggest the other group is "right". My point is that the Israeli fans were behaving in a manner designed to provoke the reaction they achieved.

Ian
 
My point is that the Israeli fans were behaving in a manner designed to provoke the reaction they achieved.

You could say the same for lots of behaviour. Saying Look What You Made Me Do just means more violence.

A bit less than 'lots' then?

There have been lots of low level incidents in the last year, both on demos and elsewhere. Should offended parties take them as just cause for a violent response?

If football fans flag burning justifies the response in Amsterdam, then your logic means others can respond with violence to people who burn their country's flag surely? How does this tit for tat attitude do anything but lead to more unrest?
 

bobzmyunkle

Senior Member
You could say the same for lots of behaviour. Saying Look What You Made Me Do just means more violence.



There have been lots of low level incidents in the last year, both on demos and elsewhere. Should offended parties take them as just cause for a violent response?

If football fans flag burning justifies the response in Amsterdam, then your logic means others can respond with violence to people who burn their country's flag surely? How does this tit for tat attitude do anything but lead to more unrest?

Sorry but nobody said anything about being justified. My objection to your post is that it's obviously another attempt to claim equivalence. - the maccabi fans burning flags in the context of their obnoxious behaviour in Amsterdam equated with your examples which must be taken in the context of thousands of peaceful pro Palestine protests worldwide.
Obviously completely absurd.
 

Psamathe

Regular
My point is that the Israeli fans were behaving in a manner designed to provoke the reaction they achieved.

You could say the same for lots of behaviour. Saying Look What You Made Me Do just means more violence.
Again you are assuming I'm trying to justify something - which I'm not. Some actions by some people in some situations are very likely to prompt a response, predictable. If you don't want the reaction then don't act in that manner. (I did point this out a few lines above but again you partially quoted what I said cutting out that bit. Discussions are easier if you don't try and misrepresent what others said.

Ian
 

Psamathe

Regular
If football fans flag burning justifies the response in Amsterdam, then your logic means others can respond with violence to people who burn their country's flag surely?
As I and others have repeatedly pointed out it's not just burning a bit of fabric but the meaning of that fabric and its destruction in the context of current middle east conflicts, together with the chants and those doing the chanting & burning. Context and meaning are the crucial aspects.

Ian
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R
My point is that once you start saying 'What do you expect when you burn our/their flag?' then all you're doing is justifying more tit for tat violence. And yes, it does look like you're defending the response.

They could have left the police to deal with the football supporters behaviour.
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
A bit less than 'lots' then?

Will these do?

https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/search/2/image?phrase=israeli+flag+burning

Flag burning in itself is a well established method of protesting. Even M&S got in on the act last Christmas burning a Palestine flag.

skynews-marks-and-spencer-advert_6345064.jpg

This Amsterdam nastiness seems to be attracting almost as much opprobrium on this forum in recent weeks as the atrocities that have been taking place in Palestine for years. It is a distraction, an unpleasant one, but not the real atrocity and nowhere near it.
 

Psamathe

Regular
My point is that once you start saying 'What do you expect when you burn our/their flag?' then all you're doing is justifying more tit for tat violence. And yes, it does look like you're defending the response.

They could have left the police to deal with the football supporters behaviour.
a. I'm repeatedly saying what the Israeli fans did was far more than burning a bit of fabric. It's context and meaning emphasised by their chants and who they were.

b.I'm repeatedly saying it's not about justifying anything, it's about what's likely to happen. Some behaviour is very likely to cause a response. Not justifying, pointing out likelihood.

c. I'm repeatedly saying it's not a zero sum game. Saying the Israeli supporters were "wrong" is NOT saying those responding were "right". Both groups can be wrong, just we are discussing the appropriateness of the Israeli fan behaviour.

Din't know how many times I need to keep repeating this but you keep partially quoting me and inferring things I'm explicitly saying isn't the case.

Ian
 
I've never visited the Netherlands and so I do not know too much about Amsterdam. However I doubt that I need to know Amsterdam to know that bigots who harass muslims are also likely to harass other minority groups including the ones that you mention.
minorities in Isreal indeed don't have a great position, mind you still better then under Hamas because Hamas drags them behind a motorcycle until they die. Something with them thinking their prophet thinks it's ''haram'' to be gay are anything in the lbtq whatever letters we are at the moment. So if they are not harrasing jews they are harrassing gays, there is an report that says so the the council of Amsterdam ignored that. A report that say muslims hate gays can't be correct right?
There's plenty of footage to show that thugs targeted people who were carrying Palestinian flags, including thugs wrapped in blue with the Star of Saint David.
Yes the ''but they started tape has been played grey on this topic'' with some going back to 1953 because of the sheer lack of arguments.
However the point still stays if 7 October never happened, the Palestinians would still be opressed by the Hamas terror movement and everything was like it was before 7 October, so we can all pretend is ok in the west the UNRWA could still pretend they are an humatarian organization Hamas could get even richer from their drugs trade and more children would die because of malnutrition but nobody gives a fark because see no evil hear no evil right?


I also know that there other groups outside of the Muslim / Jew binary who will just join in with the violence.

I also know that there will people in the area not wishing to be involved beyond being lawful football supporters.
So what? the few exceptions does not change the general intention.


I've been reading Dutch media and can't find them either.

Maybe @dutchguylivingintheuk has them from chatter on the Web.
Defending terrorist makes you blind clearly:
Halsema geeft geen nieuwe informatie over het totale aantal arrestaties: voor, tijdens en na de wedstrijd zijn 62 mensen aangehouden: 49 personen die in Nederland wonen, 10 die afkomstig zijn uit Israël. Daarnaast zijn via camerabeelden nog eens 5 verdachten opgepakt wegens openlijke geweldpleging.

it says they arrested 10 people who are from Isreal
fromt this link: https://www.parool.nl/amsterdam/hal...en-om-giftige-cocktail-te-bedwingen~b07bdbd8/
Don't forget you reading glasses before you claim it was from ''chatter on the web''

You didn’t. I quoted what you said, which was that the flags had been conveniently placed there.

The one I showed you in my reply wasn’t conveniently placed. It’s been there for over a year and can be seen in the same spot on Google street view long before the Israeli thugs visited.
nit-picking
And if people hung flags prior to the date of the game, so what? Israelis can’t keep blaming others for their own crimes, even if it’s what they’re used to getting away with.
How many Isreali flags would have been destroyed if they similarly placed them everywhere during an pro-palestina protest? Exactly, the one group is not that much better then the other.



Commentary from many UK reporters based in Israel is that Israeli media are not publicising the plight of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, so much of the Israeli population is in an echo chamber fairly unaware of atrocities and probable war crimes.
Uk media also doesn't paint the full picture,(news in general) they also try to build an narrative, but in Isreal they have internet too you know?
Having said that, we also have to look at how things are going and then we can say that Isreal is more democratic than it's neighbours, but still it's not what we are expected and see as democracy here in Europe. And also something western Media isn't covering, there are demostrations against Nethanyahu, Isreal is suffering from a brain-drain(which was already happening before 7 October) and the current generation will suffer from this war for years.
War is hell it places and enormous burden on every parties involved.
So to say it's an Echo chamber no i don't agree, i also don't say that every action isreal has taken or is going to take is great, i think there are quite a few disputable actions from their site to put it mildly. But if you look at isrealy english written media of media with an english page there are quite a fe difference in tone, way of reporting etc. just as we have the daily fail here with a completely different tone than bbc news.

So adding a few flags to demonstrate local opinion seems a reasonable and peaceful way to highlight issues and local sentiment. Nothing that should provoke flag burning, attacking a taxi, "we will fark the Arabs", etc.

From reports I've seen I suspect the Israeli football fans provoked exactly what they intended.

Ian
Some find it reasonable and peacefull to demostrate against a mosque to put pieces of streaky bacon on the floor, yet the reaction from some angry mops is seldom peacefull, and then there is a other point too, and that the point that not all Maccabi supporters burned those flags or scant those slogans, but all of them where targeted, where is the justice in that?

A bit less than 'lots' then?
it never enough is it?
 
Sorry but nobody said anything about being justified. My objection to your post is that it's obviously another attempt to claim equivalence. - the maccabi fans burning flags in the context of their obnoxious behaviour in Amsterdam equated with your examples which must be taken in the context of thousands of peaceful pro Palestine protests worldwide.
Obviously completely absurd.
Why do they need so many riot police to seperate them from pro-isreal protest then?
There is nothing peacefull about the pro-palestina camp. Neither about the pro-isreal is a whole either, both have agressors amongst their ranks and if their is no riot police it's going to get messy.
 
Top Bottom