C R
Über Member
Prof Myers nails it again
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyn...ferent-to-the-lives-of-palestinian-civilians/
https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyn...ferent-to-the-lives-of-palestinian-civilians/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveb...amas-attacker-describing-orders-to-kill-rape/ and https://www.reuters.com/world/nato-ministers-shown-horrific-video-hamas-attack-2023-10-12/ if i would have a bit more time i can dig up more(i known i have seen them earlier) but to be honest the colors of the left wing press become clear it's much easier to find 30 articles about the same attack on Gaza then anything on isreal, where it has to be said that every Gaza attack the number involving victims etc. are always taken as a fact, as where with Isreal they always add ''according to isreali sources'' don't get me wrong i think they should add what is the source i just find it strange, they only do that with one side, as if terrorist are more reliable.Who has confirmed it. No reliable news source has reported it as true.
Repeating the same old lie doesn't make it true.No there wasn't.
Which part of 'the story was found out to be false by the IDF within 48 hours' is not sinking in to your skull?
Any link then? because like i said i followed it very closely and i known what you're talking about but i'm a 100% certain they said ''we can't confirm'' which is as you might known something else then false.No they haven't. The IDF dismissed it as false within 48 hours as reported by The Guardian, CNN, Al Jazeera and the SCMP.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveb...amas-attacker-describing-orders-to-kill-rape/ and https://www.reuters.com/world/nato-ministers-shown-horrific-video-hamas-attack-2023-10-12/ if i would have a bit more time i can dig up more(i known i have seen them earlier) but to be honest the colors of the left wing press become clear it's much easier to find 30 articles about the same attack on Gaza then anything on isreal, where it has to be said that every Gaza attack the number involving victims etc. are always taken as a fact, as where with Isreal they always add ''according to isreali sources'' don't get me wrong i think they should add what is the source i just find it strange, they only do that with one side, as if terrorist are more reliable.
Repeating the same old lie doesn't make it true.
Any link then? because like i said i followed it very closely and i known what you're talking about but i'm a 100% certain they said ''we can't confirm'' which is as you might known something else then false.
The reuters link specifically says that there were no images of beheaded babies.
I hear she does bite the heads off jelly babies.
Such barbarism.
You want pictures of beheaded babies.
Jihadi is strong in this one
Nevermind.
it's also not both Ethnic cleansing because Isreal warns well before they start, which makes the first word ''Ethnic'' from Ethnicity a bit silly because if you want to kill an whole ethnicity you give them no warning but try to kill as much as possible
That’s about as useful as warning all the fish in a barrel to swim only on one side before you start shooting into it.
Gaza is one of the most densely populated places in the world and on three sides it’s surrounded by a huge wall with remote control machine guns and on the fourth side there’s the sea (patrolled and blockaded by Israeli military forces).
Seemingly intractable problems call for proactive blue-sky thinking outside the box.
I've checked, and the state of Israel is an area roughly the size of Wales.
We're not doing much with Wales at the moment.
The Nobel Peace Prize? Moi? Why, thankyou.
It's still a warning and there is also still no evidence isreal seek to semtimaircally kill all palestinians, they objective is to take out Hamas and they killed two high ranked of them today so not fully unsuccesfull. But as you say so yourself it's very densely populated, so indeed civilain causalties are inevitable and no i'm also not saying Isreal is using the best techniques etc. However it is not ethnic cleansing. I stand by my point that that is what Hamas did.That’s about as useful as warning all the fish in a barrel to swim only on one side before you start shooting into it.
Gaza is one of the most densely populated places in the world and on three sides it’s surrounded by a huge wall with remote control machine guns and on the fourth side there’s the sea (patrolled and blockaded by Israeli military forces).
Somewhere this week Isreal asked Google and other to remove those, if you're in a war you don't want you're enemy being able to streetview your defences for some reason. Bit of a moot point to be honest because Hamas most likely has every inch of that fence network detailed.I tried to use Google to have a look at the Gaza / Israel border but for some reason the streetview pictures from the nearby main road, rather than their usual 360° outside view are taken from inside the car with a single aspect straight ahead. Can't think why.
Edit: just had a look and even that seems to have been taken down now.
Seemingly intractable problems call for proactive blue-sky thinking outside the box.
I've checked, and the state of Israel is an area roughly the size of Wales.
We're not doing much with Wales at the moment.
The Nobel Peace Prize? Moi? Why, thankyou.
What else can Isreal realitically do to prevent the thread of Hamas and all those Hezbollah fractions Iran has been funding? Other then all out war to root them all out? (which let's not pretend will come and a considerable cost for the isreali army too, as does all urban fighting.
Not sure what this word is and it is probably true that they are not trying to kill all Palestinians but it certainly looks as if they don't care if they do as long as they get revenge and destroy Hamas. I doubt whether the families of those Palestinians killed are as worried as the people on this forum are about the definition of ethnic cleansing.also still no evidence isreal seek to semtimaircally kill all palestinians
Not a bad result, killing two high ranking Hamas members today while accidentally killing 700 Palestinians (some of whom will obviously also be Hamas members). What is the ratio of deaths of civilians to Hamas members that would be unacceptable to you.they objective is to take out Hamas and they killed two high ranked of them today so not fully unsuccesfull.