Israel / Palestine
- Thread starter Beebo
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
fozy tornip
fozympotent
theclaud
Reading around the chip
winjim
Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
Interesting article here, although check the date, regarding Israel's supposed right to self defence. It basically goes back to the first point I made in this thread, post #2.
I know that the opposing view has been discussed elsewhere but the argument is that Article 51 of the UN charter, the right to self defence, applies only to a state defending itself against attack by another state. It can't be applied to an attack from occupied territory since that's an area ostensibly under the control of the occupying power.
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/article-51-israels-false-claim/
I know that the opposing view has been discussed elsewhere but the argument is that Article 51 of the UN charter, the right to self defence, applies only to a state defending itself against attack by another state. It can't be applied to an attack from occupied territory since that's an area ostensibly under the control of the occupying power.
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/article-51-israels-false-claim/
theclaud
Reading around the chip
dutchguylivingintheuk
Über Member
You clearly haven't read his messages, or it's the old leftish ''i don't agree with him so he must be stupid''
They banned just like other european countries pro-hamas protest, that is something else.
dutchguylivingintheuk
Über Member
Nice twitter picture thingy for all those ''i stand with'' types:
View: https://twitter.com/Imamofpeace/status/1718666030170399084/photo/1
Every little helps..
View: https://twitter.com/Imamofpeace/status/1718666030170399084/photo/1
Every little helps..
cookiemonster
Veteran
- Location
- Far away from the asylum
D
Deleted member 121
Guest
Then proceeds to post this:
Which features more images of "flying" than it does "standing"...
Take it away George...
This shows the danger of getting your news information from social media. It's simply not true.
The right to assemble to protest is guaranteed under the constitution. This includes supporting Palestinians and carrying their flag is allowed. What is not allowed is showing any support for known terrorist organisations, which would include Hamas, either in word or displaying flags and emblems. Stirring up hatred of other ethnicities also not allowed, and this would include displays of hatred towards Jews of the 'gas the Jews' variety in Sydney or celebrating the massacre perpetrated by Hamas. The historical reason for this ought to be only too obvious. A raw conscience only too well aware of where such hatred leads.
Burning the Israeli flag is illegal, as is burning any national flag.
Now some pro-Palestinian demonstrations have been banned, where the authorities considered the illegal activity noted above was likely to occur e.g. organised by known terrorist sympathisers. This can and has been challenged in the courts, a fast-track procedure is available, and at least on one occasion the ban was lifted as the court wasn't satisfied anything illegal was likely to occur.
theclaud
Reading around the chip
theclaud
Reading around the chip
As with your content, I've read just enough of it it to get his number, thanks.
This gives the impression that to love his religion he has to be anti-Israel.
theclaud
Reading around the chip
The smart money is on him being a sectarian propagandist, if not an outright grifter. He's the Kellie-Jay Keen of Islam.