winjim
Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
Yes, and yes...and so on and on and on and on and on.....................
OK, so Palestine has the right to self defence as Israel has the right to self defence. That does raise some issues though.
It supposes that 'Palestine' exists as an entity and that it is separate from Israel.
It supposes that the right to self defence is independent of anything that might be written in Art 51. Art 51 is part of the UN charter and applies to UN member states, which Palestine is not. So we can stop referring to it as the right to self defence exists without it.
Israel has the right to self defence.
Palestine has the right to self defence.
Israel has the means of self defence.
Palestine does not have the means of self defence because Israel won't allow it. So if it has the right but is unable to exercise it, does it have that right at all? Should it be provided with such an ability?
I have no conclusion to this, it's just some rambling thoughts I had.