Laurence Fox vs Mukhtar

[matticus]

"misogyny" => Like. Thank-you Bromptonaut for your participation in this experiment!

 

[mudsticks]

"misogyny" => Like. Thank-you Bromptonaut for your participation in this experiment!

Nice one for belittling a problem that does not affect you directly .
Such a great way to tell on yourself 👍🏼

 

[Ian H]

Nice one for belittling a problem that does not affect you directly .
Such a great way to tell on yourself 👍🏼

You may not rate Matt's empathy, but is he shaggable?

 

[BoldonLad]

You may not rate Matt's empathy, but is he shaggable?

I am sure women never ask such a question.

 

[mudsticks]

You may not rate Matt's empathy, but is he shaggable?

I expect he probably is in the literal

'Would it be physically possible to have intercourse with this person?"
sense

In terms of being even remotely attracted to the idea.?!?!

It's a hard NO from me.

 

[Poacher]

I've been told that Laurence Fox is so attractive to women he has to beat them off with a stick!

 

[Poacher]

Now I've been told that I misheard, and the message was that Laurence Fox is so unattractive to women he has to beat himself off with a stick! Much more plausible.

 

[winjim]

Life is so much simpler when you've got a hot wife. Saves having to think about all that nonsense. Somebody ought to recommend it to Mr Fox.

 

[matticus]

I am sure women never ask such a question.

Oi - whose bloody side are you on?!?

 

[Mr Celine]

Life is so much simpler when you've got a hot wife.

Unless it's due to the menopause.

 

[matticus]

You may not rate Matt's empathy, but is he shaggable?

In terms of being even remotely attracted to the idea.?!?!

It's a hard NO from me.

I'd like to confirm what the current etiquette is on this, before I choose to take offence:
Is it OK to judge someone's shaggability (baby) if you only base it on their words, intellect, politics and ideas? And not physical appearance.

If so, I guess I'm completely OK with mudsticks' comment; it's a valid opinion. I applaud her outspoken honesty.

 

[Pale Rider]

Thick twat

Brainless, moronic, non-argument.

You are, as always, full of shite.

How's the Trumpton drugs conspiracy doing?

Several posters have asked, but you decline to answer.

Be honest, you made it all up, didn't you?

 

[mudsticks]

I'd like to confirm what the current etiquette is on this, before I choose to take offence:
Is it OK to judge someone's shaggability (baby) if you only base it on their *words, intellect, politics and ideas? And not physical appearance.

If so, I guess I'm completely OK with mudsticks' comment; it's a valid opinion. I applaud her outspoken honesty.

All those* things would have to be taken into consideration, well before any external characteristics came into play, in my book.

Pretending not to understand what does or doesn't constitute misogyny in public discourse would naturally feed into that overall appraisal of personality traits.

Life is so much simpler when you've got a hot wife. Saves having to think about all that nonsense. Somebody ought to recommend it to Mr Fox.

🙏🏼

I'd like to thank Ms J for her services on behalf of my fellow grown woman.
For relieving the rest of from what would otherwise have been, a no doubt relentless bodily objectification, and 'rating' on your personal 'shaggability' score .👍🏼

 

[winjim]

🙏🏼

I'd like to thank Ms J for her services on behalf of my fellow grown woman.
For relieving the rest of from what would otherwise have been, a no doubt relentless bodily objectification, and 'rating' on your personal 'shaggability' score .👍🏼

She is selflessly taking one for the team, as it were.

 

[mudsticks]

She is selflessly taking one for the team, as it were.

In addition to all her other services to society -
Quite the woman of courage. 🙏🏼