swansonj
Regular
Genuine question: do you not see any difference in likely outcomes from a Johnson and a Starmer led government?Lol....tell me what I'm voting for and I'll consider it ?
I mean is there any point if nothing changes.
Genuine question: do you not see any difference in likely outcomes from a Johnson and a Starmer led government?Lol....tell me what I'm voting for and I'll consider it ?
I mean is there any point if nothing changes.
Genuine question what is Labour offering other than being a alternative ?Genuine question: do you not see any difference in likely outcomes from a Johnson and a Starmer led government?
The huge problem with our first past the post system and a virtual duopoly is that very often a vote not for Labour has the same effect as a vote for the Tories in terms of forming a government.I didn't put him there.In fact some at the last election were willing to lend there votes to anyone as long as Brexit went there way ?
Take your point...push come to shove I might be persuaded.The huge problem with our first past the post system and a virtual duopoly is that very often a vote not for Labour has the same effect as a vote for the Tories in terms of forming a government.
Sadly, in some cases, the least worst option is the best in general elections if it is important to you not to have a particular government.
Lol....tell me what I'm voting for and I'll consider it ?
I mean is there any point if nothing changes.
Your past worrying about policy....how nice ? Maybe there's plenty who aren't !Do you think that a Starmer government will not be any better at basic governance than Johnson - leaving aside policy?
Things like being able to manage his own MPs so that he can retain public health options? Not "spaffing" £££ of taxpayer money on £850 a roll wallpaper? Billions wasted on ill conceived projects or worse, given to cronies? "Levelling up" funds used to tarmac roads on the property of Tory Lords?
I am past worrying about policy. I think some basic ability to govern and earn some level of public trust would be rather jolly. This government needs to be gone - it is the only way to sideline the madness of the ERG and other fringe Tory backbench lobby groups who are preventing decent governance because they are - frankly - lunatics.
Srsly tho Bolders (assuming you don't feel the same as @mudsticks does about the appellation*) what's with this 'It's not how I talk in the pub' complaint about posts? I do the pub metaphor thing about the forum myself at times, but that's all it is. Why on earth should posts on a forum be like how people speak to their mates in the boozer, and how would that be possible, even if it were desirable? Is it a demand you carry into all situations and across all forms?No shit.
Srsly tho Bolders (assuming you don't feel the same as @mudsticks does about the appellation*) what's with this 'It's not how I talk in the pub' complaint about posts? I do the pub metaphor thing about the forum myself at times, but that's all it is. Why on earth should posts on a forum be like how people speak to their mates in the boozer, and how would that be possible, even if it were desirable? Is it a demand you carry into all situations and across all forms?
*![]()
Tbh I think it might get taken the wrong way if I performed quite so many 'knowing winkies' down our local...
![]()
Srsly tho Bolders (assuming you don't feel the same as @mudsticks does about the appellation*) what's with this 'It's not how I talk in the pub' complaint about posts? I do the pub metaphor thing about the forum myself at times, but that's all it is. Why on earth should posts on a forum be like how people speak to their mates in the boozer, and how would that be possible, even if it were desirable? Is it a demand you carry into all situations and across all forms?
*![]()
The last election has gone. Time to move on.Take your point...push come to shove I might be persuaded.
As a Corbyn supporter after the shite of the last election it still smarts a bit, A fecking lot !
Those are not different: purging the most divisive members is one oft-used way to end up with a united party. Boris united his party by purging the likes of Grieve and Clarke but he could call an election and set selection requirements to do it, which is a tool Starmer does not have.He came in promising to unite the party,instead he seems to be trying to purge any left leaning members.
What 10 pledges? And this is what will make many people vote Labour, Rayner playing Prescott to Starmer's slick lawyer:Out of his 10 pledges he won the leadership campaign on how many has he broke ?
He instills zero confidence in me and the more I see and hear the more bland it becomes.
Phew thanks.....I feel better.The last election has gone. Time to move
Am I meant to admire Johnson for this ?Those are not different: purging the most divisive members is one oft-used way to end up with a united party. Boris united his party by purging the likes of Grieve and Clarke but he could call an election and set selection requirements to do it, which is a tool Starmer does not have.
Have a read through if you like.As for Rayner playing Prescott and Starmer as the slick lawyer lol....didn't think anyone watched Spitting Image anymoreWhat 10 pledges? And this is what will make many people vote Labour, Rayner playing Prescott to Starmer's slick lawyer:
Much prefer Rayner.What 10 pledges? And this is what will make many people vote Labour, Rayner playing Prescott to Starmer's slick lawyer
Is there anything he could say about it that would meet with your approval?What the feck has Starmer actually said about it