Population decline

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

HMS_Dave

Member
Zero Hour Contracts offers no security and guaranteed hours. It can be a good gig if you have few commitments, but having a mortgage, kids and repayments tends to lead people to question its viability to them, which is also perfectly reasonable.

Turning into a "my family member does so it's great" and "stop whinging" is pretty short sighted. It really isn't viable to many.
 
It certainly works for some but too often it's become a way of employers being able to reduce their responsibilities and costs compared to giving people full time posts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

CXRAndy

Well-Known Member
Turning into a "my family member does so it's great" and "stop whinging" is pretty short sighted. It really isn't viable to many

It certainly works for some but too often it's become a way of employers being able to reduce their responsibilities and costs compared to giving people full time posts.


They're in business, potentially have less staff, less profits.

Zero contract accounts for still a small proportion of employment

There are still many more parts time workers compared to zero hours in the order 7-1
 

icowden

Squire
Perhaps, that is a situation where a zero hours contract suits the employee AND employer. My brother (retired firefighter) has been on a zero hours deal at a National Undertaker for 10 years, suits him just fine. I did similar (although, not at an undertakers).

Oh absolutely. My point is that whilst many pensioners take a part time job so they have something to do and people to chat to, this doesn't finance their pension or solve the issue that we have far more elderly people than working age people.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Oh absolutely. My point is that whilst many pensioners take a part time job so they have something to do and people to chat to, this doesn't finance their pension or solve the issue that we have far more elderly people than working age people.

Approximately 2/3rds of the UK population are working age, so, I fail to see how the bolded statement can be true?
 

CXRAndy

Well-Known Member
So essentially she is working until she drops in order to have healthcare.
That's not something to aspire to IMHO

She wants to work, she has a great job, part of the management team looking after retired billionaires in their 80s,90s

It's far better than waiting to die on minimum pension
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
She wants to work, she has a great job, part of the management team looking after retired billionaires in their 80s,90s

It's far better than waiting to die on minimum pension

Did you write Rachel Reeves' CV?

Go on, admit it, she's a carer wiping ar*es in an expensive retirement home.
 
Last edited:

CXRAndy

Well-Known Member
Did you write Rachel Reeves' CV?

They live in super skyscrapers, all their needs catered for

My sister tells me about one resident, who has 3 Bentleys. She wears the same colour dress to match the Bentley when she goes for a drive

Go and look up these facilities
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
No, just reluctant.
To help you out. There are over 300,000 millionaires in New York, over 600,000 millionaires in California.
These wealthy people aren't concerned with cost, they want luxury and they get it

Including having their ar*es wiped by elderly people who have to work because they're on minimum pension.

But everything's grand, it's millionaires' sh*t.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom