Starmer's vision quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

icowden

Pharaoh
The difference  is the cohort, and that is the significant difference. The term "failed asylum seeker" is a clue.
It's also nonsensical when I think about it. I mean - what is a failed asylum seeker family? If the person has not been given asylum then I don't think they can bring their family. If the family have been granted asylum but not one member, that problem is for the single person who wasn't granted?

Are they really a problem or is this just a cure in search of a problem?
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

briantrumpet

Timewaster
It's also nonsensical when I think about it. I mean - what is a failed asylum seeker family? If the person has not been given asylum then I don't think they can bring their family. If the family have been granted asylum but not one member, that problem is for the single person who wasn't granted?

Are they really a problem or is this just a cure in search of a problem?

Haven't had time to check, but it seems that Mahmood might have been inspired by – wait for it – Kristi Noem's asylum policy. (In a side note, apparently Trump is asking if she can be sacked – I'd not be surprised after yesterday's performance.)
 

briantrumpet

Timewaster
Mahmood caught making stuff up to justify her cruelty.

1772734464155.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

AuroraSaab

Pharaoh
It's also nonsensical when I think about it. I mean - what is a failed asylum seeker family? If the person has not been given asylum then I don't think they can bring their family
Would presumably mean those who came on work or student visas, brought their spouse and children, then applied for asylum once those visas had expired. Would also mean families who were given holiday visas to visit the UK, or who didn't need a visa, but failed to leave after the holiday, stayed and applied for asylum.

Will also include the small numbers who arrive with children via the channel or people smuggling routes.

Some figures here, though it doesn't split the stats between individuals and families.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/visa-brake-imposed-on-4-countries-after-widespread-visa-abuse
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Would presumably mean those who came on work or student visas, brought their spouse and children, then applied for asylum once those visas had expired. Would also mean families who were given holiday visas to visit the UK, or who didn't need a visa, but failed to leave after the holiday, stayed and applied for asylum.

Will also include the small numbers who arrive with children via the channel or people smuggling routes.

Some figures here, though it doesn't split the stats between individuals and families.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/visa-brake-imposed-on-4-countries-after-widespread-visa-abuse

It’s an “accountant’s solution” ie, the
Justification is on cost alone.

Not saying I believe it has been accurately costed, we are talking about Government figures here.
 
Top Bottom