The last three before you even begin to think about Nuclear for me...for a Labour party it should go without saying.Or you have them all, spend far more on the last three, and have ongoing discussion about how much that spend should be.
The last three before you even begin to think about Nuclear for me...
RIP.And there we have Adam's problem, right there.
Refusal to think.
I wonder what might happen if the US, France, and the UK gave up their nuclear weapons?
Hmmmm....
We'd all be speaking Russian/Cantonese or living in the landscape of McCarthy's 'The Road', but with radiation sickness and blast burns?
https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1708361097693249731?s=20
Starmer setting out clear distance between attitude of next Labour government and current Tory one.
Obviously, Adam will pop in for a whine.
https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1708361097693249731?s=20
Starmer setting out clear distance between attitude of next Labour government and current Tory one, especially in the light of the Home Secretary's recent comments.
Obviously, Adam will pop by for a glass of whine.
This has been promised for three years so nothing new.
While potentially a positive step, as it stands it does not provide clear distance. It is a wish-list platitude that could mean anything to anyone without committing himself to any details for scrutiny.
Does it make any difference how long it has been promised, if the promise is coming from a party not able to enact it until elected?
It's happening.
https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1708361097693249731?s=20
Starmer setting out clear distance between attitude of next Labour government and current Tory one, especially in the light of the Home Secretary's recent comments.
Obviously, Adam will pop by for a glass of whine.