Starmer's vision quest

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Ian H

Legendary Member
We know what areas it fell short in. It wasn't wide ranging enough. It covered only a few towns when gangs were operating in many towns and cities. It skirted around cultural sensitivities. We now know councils and organisations withheld relevant information from Jay.

This is probably the biggest social scandal in the UK in the last 50 years. It affected thousands of girls. We can't ensure it doesn't happen again if we aren't willing to fully investigate what occurred.

Implementing the Jay recommendations won't shed any more light on the institutions and individuals who failed these girls. Only a new far ranging enquiry will do that.

Anyone other than far-right disruptors calling for another enquiry?
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

multitool

Pharaoh
Anyone other than far-right disruptors calling for another enquiry?

What?

Are you calling Aurora a far-right agitator???
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
Last edited:

Rusty Nails

Country Member
We know what areas it fell short in. It wasn't wide ranging enough. It covered only a few towns when gangs were operating in many towns and cities. It skirted around cultural sensitivities. We now know councils and organisations withheld relevant information from Jay.

This is probably the biggest social scandal in the UK in the last 50 years. It affected thousands of girls. We can't ensure it doesn't happen again if we aren't willing to fully investigate what occurred.

Implementing the Jay recommendations won't shed any more light on the institutions and individuals who failed these girls. Only a new far ranging enquiry will do that.

The recommendations were not limited to specific towns or cities and are designed to reduce the chance of it happening elsewhere if introduced nationally. That must be the priority.

A national inquiry is not best suited to look in detail at scandals and their causes/remedies in individual locations imo, and allows for more delay and even more difficulty in ensuring every authority/organisation/person involved doesn't withold relevant information, especially years down the line.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
We know what areas it fell short in. It wasn't wide ranging enough. It covered only a few towns when gangs were operating in many towns and cities. It skirted around cultural sensitivities. We now know councils and organisations withheld relevant information from Jay.

This is probably the biggest social scandal in the UK in the last 50 years. It affected thousands of girls. We can't ensure it doesn't happen again if we aren't willing to fully investigate what occurred.

Implementing the Jay recommendations won't shed any more light on the institutions and individuals who failed these girls. Only a new far ranging enquiry will do that.

Is it not important to take effective action against it happening now, to new victims, rather than kicking the can down the road, with yet another Enquiry?
 
Is it not important to take effective action against it happening now, to new victims, rather than kicking the can down the road, with yet another Enquiry?

Why can't both be done? You don't need to wait for a full inquiry to implement Jay's recommendations.

Anyone other than far-right disruptors calling for another enquiry?

The Rotherham whistleblower.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ex...istleblower-grooming-gang-scandal-inquiry/amp

Screenshot_20250107_194444_Chrome.jpg

Yes, Jayne, with your MBE for years of working with vulnerable girls and ten years of working to publicise this scandal, you're a far right disrupter, I'm afraid.

Telford victim called for one according to Newsnight.


View: https://x.com/BBCNewsnight/status/1876407532711035089


Journalist Charlie Peters has done extensive work with victims:

Screenshot_20250107_195941_Chrome.jpg



There are victims who don't support another enquiry. Mostly that seems to be because the last one achieved very little in practical terms.

It must be very difficult for the survivors of this epidemic of rape, violence, and abuse, to now have their motives questioned.
 
Last edited:

multitool

Pharaoh
Don't be fatuous. Its very clear given the context of Musk citing Yaxley-Lennon that Starmer's "far right" comment was aimed at Yaxley-Lennon and not everyone involved in exposing these crimes.
 

BoldonLad

Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
Location
South Tyneside
More not so good news on the economy today, the cost of servicing UK Government Debt rises, how long before we get a Critique of Reeves from God aka Elon.
 

theclaud

Reading around the chip
She was beatified after her death by the left wing of the Labour party as she fulfilled the holy trinity of expectations of the left wing (never actually achieving anything and therefore never being able to be held to account, being vulgar, attacking and undermining those who did deliver for the Labour Party)

Very gracious. Are you Giles Coren?
 

matticus

Guru
It must be very difficult for the survivors of this epidemic of rape, violence, and abuse, to now have their motives questioned.

I don't see that happening. I haven't (yet) read any criticism of the surivivors.
What I DO see - here and across the media - is criticism of attention-seeking politicians and oligarchs
 

theclaud

Reading around the chip
Clearly not. But thanks for the snark.

Bit of an unhinged diatribe against a very smart and prematurely deceased journalist who spent most of her time writing about the housing crisis, Grenfell, and cycling. Perhaps you are Toby Young, then?
 
Top Bottom