winjim
Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
Is this a game of spot the deadly danger? You'll need to tell me because I can't see it.
Don't pretend not to understand
Is this a game of spot the deadly danger? You'll need to tell me because I can't see it.
So all refugees should go to other countries. Got it. What if they implement the same policy? Where do they go then? Refugees tend to naturally split between countries. We are nowhere near taking the heaviest burden.I'm sure there are plenty of other places where they won't be tortured etc. That is, the ones who are not economic migrants.
Got it. We should leave them to starve and die of exposure on the streets. Very cost effective. Do we also refuse emergency medical care when they are malnourished and ill? What is the impact on the illegal sex industry and human trafficking? Do we need more POlice for that are does it not matter because they are foreign?I'm not an expert in how to deal with these things but for starters we could stop being so generous to illegal arrivals (hotel accommodation, benefits etc).
Oh - so you want to put them in prison. That's a saving of about £5k per refugee.And have a decent deterrent such as holding them in detention or an offshore location, or where it is clear that they are not here to escape mortal danger, a speedy return to their country of origin.
I'm still waiting for the details of the intercept plan from you and @CXRAndy. You don't seem to have one yet.At least we have now got the French to do what they agreed and intercept small boats in the water on their side of the channel.
Tbf, I think we should get a refund from France as that's a lot of money to give them for shrugging their shoulders, saying "Bof!" and lighting a gauloise.How well do you think the French will look for the small boats? Is there any chance that they might spot them when they are say, around about 12 miles offshore and in British waters before shrugging their shoulders, saying "Bof!" and lighting a gauloise?
You don't seem to have one yet.
Bear in mind that you can't break international maritime law
But how are you going to prove that you are getting value for money?Tbf, I think we should get a refund from France as that's a lot of money to give them for shrugging their shoulders, saying "Bof!" and lighting a gauloise.
But how are you going to prove that you are getting value for money?
The sensible course would have been not to give money to France in the first place and to set up legal routes for people to apply for Asylum. Take the jobs away from the traffickers.
At the same time, we could join some sort of co-operative group of European countries and work on a strategy across Europe to help asylum seekers in a fair way without overburdening any individual country...
But how are you going to prove that you are getting value for money?
The sensible course would have been not to give money to France in the first place and to set up legal routes for people to apply for Asylum. Take the jobs away from the traffickers.
At the same time, we could join some sort of co-operative group of European countries and work on a strategy across Europe to help asylum seekers in a fair way without overburdening any individual country...
Don't pretend not to understand
Don't pretend not to understand
If the danger was that obvious then I'm sure I would have spotted it.
Instead of playing 'whack a mole' for what you're trying to get at
Just say it![]()
National emergency-effectively war footing
24 hour drone surveillance across the channel. High speed interceptor boats, larger return vessels, drop them off back on France.
Don't forget the machine guns. Let's see those .50cal incendiary rounds ripping into their soft, puny bodies & shocked, wide-eyed, terrified faces at 1500 rpm, reducing them to red spray and bloodrags on the surface of the water if they DO NOT COMPLY IMMEDIATELY.
That's what you really want.
Agreed. The original First Blood's a stone-cold classic.Cracking film btw. All the Rambos are.