Strike!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
This should show other employers how to avoid strike action. These deals can be done and should be.
Well done Sharon Graham !
 

winjim

Welcome yourself into the new modern crisis
This should show other employers how to avoid strike action. These deals can be done and should be.
Well done Sharon Graham !

I thought we were supposed to want a strike. Or is that just David Lammy? I'm so confused.
 
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
I thought we were supposed to want a strike. Or is that just David Lammy? I'm so confused.
This is a good example of why it's so important to have unions and to support them ....Lammys a prick !
David Lammy refuses to support Unite members at British Airways fighting to restore the 10 per cent pay cut by the airline during the pandemic.
Sharon Graham, Unite general secretary says “Supporting bad bosses is a new low for Labour”
 

Craig the cyclist

Über Member
Is this another case of Labour being to scared to have any backbone at all....this is pathetic from Lammy.Hes only just realised that maybe the general public actually support the strikes 🙄

View: https://twitter.com/DavidLammy/status/1542118619563302912?t=Z8MO3h541nArCZqyYR971Q&s=19


He really is getting some form for blaming others.

The Durham incident he said categorically that both Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner were not there together. Also that they didn't have a curry. Then he blamed the 'office' for not giving him the facts which were exactly the opposite. Why didn't he just ask them both and cut out the middle man? Oh it is because they were trying to hide the story weren't they?

He has blamed a clerical officer, and changed systems, for his non-declaration of income. Which is always his responsibility.

He is now blaming an incorrect briefing "In a letter to a constituent involved in the dispute, first reported by the Mirror, Lammy said he had been misinformed,". For someone who has just said that people in public life should apologise and correct if they make a mistake, he is doing it by blaming other people. I think he could have just Googled that one.
 
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
The Durham incident he said categorically that both Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner were not there together. Also that they didn't have a curry. Then he blamed the 'office' for not giving him the facts which were exactly the opposite. Why didn't he just ask them both and cut out the middle man? Oh it is because they were trying to hide the story weren't they?
VFB4.gif

Wrong thread......
 
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
I am not aware of any public love in for Lynch, and it is just human nature for people to be less than enthusiastic about support for strikes when it costs or inconveniences them and their families.
Who would have thought it 🙄
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/mick-lynch-rmt-rail-strike-poll-b2112260.html
 
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
Hang on, a self declared socialist unambiguously standing up for working people? How could that ever be a popular strategy?
I have a feeling Mick might not be going to get as much tv/media interviews anytime soon....
 

Rusty Nails

Country Member
Hang on, a self declared socialist unambiguously standing up for working people? How could that ever be a popular strategy?

The positive thing for me out of this is it shows that the public will support a sharp-witted, left of centre leader who knows how to handle a largely hostile press without whining. It brings into perspective the poor performance and limitations of the last two leaders of the Labour Party and seven wasted years.
 
D

Deleted member 49

Guest
The positive thing for me out of this is it shows that the public will support a sharp-witted, left of centre leader who knows how to handle a largely hostile press without whining. It brings into perspective the poor performance and limitations of the last two leaders of the Labour Party and seven wasted years.
I was waiting for that sh1te.....do tell what happened in 2017 ?
 
Top Bottom