I'll bite.
You seem to think we were generous.
I'm sure I've asked before but how much would this woman and her child have for food etc every week while in Asylum Accom provided through Serco or whatever?
As far as I know, women with children do better as asylum seekers than single males.
Thus the lass in the Guardian story was in a position, either by luck or design, to get the best out of the asylum system.
That must include suitable accommodation for a mother and child, enough money to live on, and free education and healthcare.
To me, given the starting point is our country does literally nothing for her, what he have done is reasonably generous.
I wonder what she would get if she pitched up in other countries, next to nothing in the poorer ones, and I'm far from certain if our western European neighbours would be as accommodating.
Which, of course, is why we see the desperate measures taken by some to get into the UK.
Believe it or not, I generally agree with this woman being given what she has been given.
What I object to is people squawking about us being beastly and nasty to asylum seekers when we are plainly not.