BoldonLad
Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
- Location
- South Tyneside
The issue isn't about giving up but about being realistic of the challenges. For over 80 years we've been in the US's pocket when it comes to the defence of Europe. Suddenly, we've got a US leader hellbent on changing the landscape of the defence of the entire continent for political gain back home. Increasing the defence budget by a couple of billion pounds is not in itself going to improve the defence of Europe and build critical industry. If the US were to pull out of Europe that puts us at risk in the short and medium term against another unpredictable neighbour who wields like 6000 nuclear weapons. I think it should make us here in Europe think about whether relying on another superpower which is increasingly unpredictable and who might make further demands is right for Europe's security and instead come together for a structured, unified defence plan of Europe by Europeans because even with the EU, France has this idea and Italy want to do it this way and Poland.... etc It's fractured, disorganised and needs a unified and sovereign European defence strategy, which may come at some considerable cost.
Thought that was more or less what I said, in precis form:
If Europe were collectively to increase defence spending, and, scale back dependance on USA, wouldn't this (sensibly) mean also scaling back dependance on USA Arms manufacturers?, which is hardly a win for Trump. Of course, such a change may take years to have significant impact.
Followed up with the observation that, if we cannot realistically defend ourselves, rather than spend a lot of money on an attempt doomed to failure, why not just not do it at all:
So, if we can’t defend ourselves, why not just quit trying, and spend the defence budget on something else?
But, given that I am 78yo, I am unlikely to be around for whatever is decided, or, more likely whatever we slip into, by default.