Minister of the Drinks CabinetI'm going to have a job not thinking of her as Secretary of State for Drinking Culture and Media Sport.
To be fair, she's selling the Tories to me....Thing is, I don't want to say that Dorries was definitely pissed. I don't know that she was, although a lot of people seem to think that.
However, regardless of anything else that's going on, if I was a senior manager and had just had an investigation report published that concluded that there was an unacceptable culture of drinking at my workplace, and I had promised that I would learn my lesson and implement the recommendations of the report, and then one of the heads of department under me appeared drunk on television, that very evening, in the actual workplace no less... by five past nine the next morning that person would be gone.
Oh don't drag 'properly' cultural things like yoghurt into a discussion about the Tories JimI've eaten yoghurts with more culture than Nadine Dorries. Better for your bowels and all.
I really don;t like yoghurt - well not the proper stuffOh don't drag 'properly' cultural things like yoghurt into a discussion about the Tories Jim
I really like yoghurt ...
Zeno’s Paradox, innit?It's like a slow-motion car crash which keeps getting slower and slower to the point that you think you'll never see the end.
Do you think the police should investigate any and every allegation of retrospective covid regulation breaches that is made?
Do you think they should apply the law differently to politicians as to non-politicians?
My own answer to the first is clearly "no". There should be criteria as to when to investigate retrospectively and when not.
My own answer to the second is I honestly don't know. Seems to me you can make arguments both ways and they are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Do you think the police should investigate any and every allegation of retrospective covid regulation breaches that is made?
Do you think they should apply the law differently to politicians as to non-politicians?
My own answer to the first is clearly "no". There should be criteria as to when to investigate retrospectively and when not.
My own answer to the second is I honestly don't know. Seems to me you can make arguments both ways and they are damned if they do and damned if they don't.