Archie_tect
Active Member
40 years ago we were tree huggers, 20 years ago we were eco-warriors, earlier this year we were 'Green Party loonies' [sic] and now we are an uncomfortable thorn.
40 years ago we were tree huggers, 20 years ago we were eco-warriors, earlier this year we were 'Green Party loonies' [sic] and now we are an uncomfortable thorn.
I watched a TV interview with David Attenborough and, while I agree totally with what he is trying to do, and the urgency of the situation, I wonder statements like 'If we do not act now it will be too late" are making the climate change argument hostage to fortune.
When is "now"? If little is done over the next ten years and the world is still plodding along with most people not noticing a real difference to their lives, despite scientific statements saying things are still getting worse, will not that give climate change deniers/apologists/polluters a chance to say "see, still here, you were just crying wolf" and carry on as usual.
In the interview I saw (a day or two ago, on BBC), he actually said "it is already too late".... now, this may be true, but, IMHO, it is not wise to say it, since a large tranch of the population will regards that as "no point doing anything". Far better to offer hope (even if he doesn't think there is any).
It's too late to halt climate change and its effects in our lifetimes, yes, as Archie has said that tipping point has already been reached.
It's not too late to try to slow it down, build resilience do things differently and make things less bad for the future.
Trouble is you've got scientists, trying to communicate complex uncertainties , but also some unavoidable cause and effect modelling to lay people (or non scientists)
Who would rather have absolute definitive answers.
In a world where there are very few such certainties.
I agree he shouldn't have said.
"It's too late"
Although he may have said that in a particular context, and it's been presented out of context..
Quite.
Only if some naughty BBC person edited the interview to miss-represent the context of his remarks.
Well also bear in mind that David is only some bloke off of the telly.
He's not even a climate scientist, although he should know a lot about it, after all these years.
Yes, but, for the majority of people, who do not avidly follow the news etc, he is one of the "public faces" of Climate Change.
yeah, fark 'em, it's not like it's a matter of life and... Oh, wait...Climate change campaigners take themselves too seriously shocker.
yeah, fark 'em, it's not like it's a matter of life and... Oh, wait...
They said on the radio that Boaty McBoatface has been moored in Greenwich to coincide with 'That's what I call Cop26' in Glasgow next week...surely the Clyde might have been better?
Perhaps it was a speeliing mystake and should have said Greenock?They said on the radio that Boaty McBoatface has been moored in Greenwich to coincide with 'That's what I call Cop26' in Glasgow next week...surely the Clyde might have been better?
For people who don't have relatives to stay with, https://cop26coalition.org/coming-to-cop26/homestay-network/ is one effort to help.The cynical among us might say that relocating the whole shebang from London, to Glasgow in November, was a calculated move to make it harder for some people to attend.
Apparently there are problems finding accomodation for everyone who wants to go.