D
Deleted member 28
Guest
Clearly, you weren't the intended audience. If you had been, I would have enlarged the font and used words of two syllables.
Took you a while to think up the second line didn't it.
Clearly, you weren't the intended audience. If you had been, I would have enlarged the font and used words of two syllables.
Took you a while to think up the second line didn't it.
C'mon shep, here boy,here boy.
Not as long as it took you to read it.
Busy answering these other poor disillusioned idiots.
Presumably @shep thinks there should be a third verdict available to juries, that of “really, really, really sure.”
Because I genuinely feel there are cases that are clear cut.
I ask the same of you, any chance Lee Rigbys killer was innocent or the Soham murderer?
Why won't YOU acknowledge this aspect of capital punishment?
Not actually what I meant
Busy answering these other poor disillusioned idiots.
Where have you answered whether you think the people I've mentioned are possibly innocent?
I've answered already it's not acceptable but I also think there are clear cut proven cases of guilt.
DO YOU THINK LEE RIGBYS KILLER IS GUILTY OF MURDER?
Do you feel that because some cases seem clear cut to you, that would justify the odd wrongful execution?
I doubt it.
What am I not acknowledging?