They think men should be in women's sports and prisons? And that a disabled person shouldn't be able to specify same sex carers? Or that a rape victim can't specify a same sex counsellor? Most people are broadly supportive of trans rights, but these are the specifics that the ideology comes down to.
They are far more articulate and thoughtful than that. These binary, robotic responses are becoming nauseating.
I posed a question specifically to icow, but this disrespectful yet predictable step-in reply is something that has become expected. I understand you feel the need to gatekeep the delicate females and are passionate about it, but it seems you simply CANNOT even accept that other women have differing thoughts and perspectives to the feminist gatekeeper movement on various issues that extend beyond binary choices. Your almost militant responses highlights this.
The fact that your allies on this forum consists of the likes of CXRAndy, who i reckon you deep down know is a goddamn creep and probably has about as much interest in your safety as a woman out and about as a Lion has in a bowl of shredded cabbage. Personally, I have engaged in many topics with you and others on subjects of women's safety in light of Sarah Everard and similar and largely I have found myself engaging and agreeing with you but was the likes of Andy giving a shït then? I don't remember him engaging in any old NACA topics surrounding these particular subjects. I mention this because why is that? Predators on the same hunting ground? Ulterior motives perhaps? To me I find this convergence fascinating if not a little bit worrying for the overall safety of women in all aspects of society.
