BoldonLad
Old man on a bike. Not a member of a clique.
- Location
- South Tyneside
Not usually, as those in cheaper and or less desirable housing areas will probably be on proportionately even lower incomes, and have even less disposable income after bills are paid.
Areas of deprivation tend also to have even less access to fresh food on their doorsteps.
ie Waitrose doesn't set up shop where the local population are on very low incomes.
If they have a local shop at all it will be more likely selling what sells - hyper processed , cheap foods.
There are a number of schemes running that are getting fresh and better food into areas where the majority of the population is on low incomes, but provision is patchy and reliant on the energy goodwill and often unpaid labour of a few concerned local citizens .
I'm sure you know all this stuff really anyway.
I feel like I've written this hundreds of times before.
Well, you may have written it a 100 times before, but, that does not necessarily make it so.....
While I would agree with some of what you say, IMHO, the subject of food and what people eat, is slightly more complex than where Waitrose choose to locate their stores.
In terms of disposable income, I would venture to suggest that (say) a nurse, or teacher (for example) living in a "low cost housing area" has more disposable income than the same living in a "high cost housing area".