I suppose one has to prove a difference between grooming and just having a chat with a minor (at the time). Hard to prove that he had romantic intentions when he was chatting to the (then) lad. But I get why he's been sacked, and I get why there is public dissaproval. I don't get the feeling this is homophobia (which is good) but as others have said, since Harris and Saville the public are more eager to get these situations banged to rights however innocent it may seem according to Schofield. And no media company would want to employ someone where there is a shadow cast on illegal behaviour, especially involving minors