Anyway, I bothered to read the article where Starmer allegedly praises Thatcher. Turns out he doesn't praise what she did at all, but praises her having a sense of purpose.
I see his point. He's talking about transformational politics. He's also trying to prise the narrative away from polarised populist certainties.
I read the article. It's not fulsome praise for Thatcher (although it's far from negative), and the rest was the same empty, policy-free soundbite waffle he always guffs out.
But we live in a world where people form their opinions and voting choices through headlines. The article was paywalled in a right-wing Sunday paper - Starmer knew bloody well what the headlines would say and that the Thatcher comment (the only notable content) would be a huge context-free headline, and the only part that cut through.
So - why? I think he gambles that centrists & the Labour Left (although he's probably happy to be shot of a few more of 'the wrong sort of voter') will still hold their noses rather than risk another 5 Tory years - so this is a play for a perceived (possibly non-existent in post-Brexit 2023) disenfranchised contingent of so-called 'One-Nation' Tories who can't stomach the squalour of the current Tory party, & for whom Thatch is some sort of totemic symbol of their lost past greatness. Or something.
I do think he's fücking his chances in Scotland - Labour's presumed resurgence here is only based on the 'I don't want to vote Labour but I can't vote for
them' idea, following the ongoing clown-car toxification of the SNP. But Thatcher is so vehemently, violently despised here that it's probably going to take Sturgeon behind bars, & pics of Humza Yousaf posing oiled & naked with an AK47, bending down to reveal a rainbow 'I ❤️ HAMAS' tattoo (across both buttocks) to have a chance of turning this around.