AndyRM
Elder Goth
Who could they have backed?
I'd kind of assumed they could have put up a new candidate? Or were things too far down the campaign trail for that to have happened?
Who could they have backed?
Too far down. They decided to disown their candidate, preferring to shoot themselves in their own metaphorical feet, rather than working with the candidate to do apologies etc and back them. Rochdale was never going to vote Tory and Galloway provided a nice easy option by essentially being pro-Palestine and anti Israel which is a position preferred by Muslims due to the constant "that's our holy land not yours" arguments.I'd kind of assumed they could have put up a new candidate? Or were things too far down the campaign trail for that to have happened?
Too far down. They decided to disown their candidate, preferring to shoot themselves in their own metaphorical feet, rather than working with the candidate to do apologies etc and back them. Rochdale was never going to vote Tory and Galloway provided a nice easy option by essentially being pro-Palestine and anti Israel which is a position preferred by Muslims due to the constant "that's our holy land not yours" arguments.
I thought the term scotch was reserved for whisky and eggs these days - that's what I was taught that at school anyway, a very long time ago.
'A scotchman was somebody from the days of horse-drawn carriages who worked on steep hills putting wooden wedges, called scotches, under the wheels of the carriages to keep them from rolling backwards'
Yeah, shame really. Agree about Galloway, about the only thing I believe on his manifesto is that he'll get the town hall clock cleaned.
So yeah, Scotland's just the same as Liverpool. 👍
Too far down. They decided to disown their candidate, preferring to shoot themselves in their own metaphorical feet, rather than working with the candidate to do apologies etc and back them. Rochdale was never going to vote Tory and Galloway provided a nice easy option by essentially being pro-Palestine and anti Israel which is a position preferred by Muslims due to the constant "that's our holy land not yours" arguments.
Except for 2017 where they elected 13 Tory MPs out of 51 possible Scottish seats, and which you keep glossing over.And yet, over the last 10+ years, Scotland has consistently elected not Labour, not Tory,
Except for 2017 where they elected 13 Tory MPs out of 51 possible Scottish seats, and which you keep glossing over.
That's 25% support for the Conservatives.
To be fair he's also demanding a Primark.
Firstly Muslims are adherent to Islam. They are a religious group and not a race of people. That religion holds that Jerusalem is Islam's third holiest site and indeed Jerusalem prior to the establishment of Israel after the second world war was populated by both Jews and Muslims. Following the establishment of Israel as a Jewish nation each side has been routinely smiting the other ever since.Are Muslims a uniform group with a hive mind?, bit racist isn’t that?
Or anti-Starmer vote. The general election may be sooner than you think. Starmer's probably a bit more concerned than you are - more focus groups needed.Typical protest vote, with no viable opposition.
Gaza won’t be a big issue in the general election.
Seems an odd position. In 5 of those 13 seats Labour had over 10,000 votes. For about 6 of those seats it might have been useful tactical voting given that those areas have only ever been SNP or Tory.To be fair, that was largely because it's what Labour told their supporters to do, in an attempt to weaken the SNP.