Starmer's vision quest
- Thread starter mjr
- Start date
Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
multitool
Guest
You really shouldn't be spending your time impugning me for what you imagine to be my thought processes, and instead should be providing evidence for your claims, because as it stands your words above just look like one big episode of projection.
ps. Using CR as your fluffer isn't the big win you imagine it to be.
Last edited:
theclaud
Reading around the chip
She was one of five Tory MPs suspended for precisely that at the time. It's only Buckland's role in it that's news.
C R
Über Member
I love you too 😘
multitool
Guest
But it wasn't "precisely that".
It was for for having tried to influence Whipple (the trial judge) by signing a letter on Commons-headed notepaper urging the judge not to release her husband’s character references. In other words, using her own position as an MP to influence a judge.
That is very different to asking the then Justice secretary and Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland, to try and influence the judge.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 159
Guest
Rayner invited to answer questions under caution by police.
AndyRM
Elder Goth
Why do you care? You don't vote.
bobzmyunkle
Senior Member
What an asset she is. Unless, of course, Keith is sending a message of things to come to the TUC.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...rike-stance-incompatible-with-labour-tuc-boss
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...rike-stance-incompatible-with-labour-tuc-boss
Xipe Totec
Something nasty in the woodshed
It's going to be Swella, isn't it?
View: https://twitter.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1789715577902104888
Can't wait to hear what a coup for 9-D chessmaster Starmer that'd be.
View: https://twitter.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1789715577902104888
Can't wait to hear what a coup for 9-D chessmaster Starmer that'd be.
theclaud
Reading around the chip
I, for one, am terribly shocked that a blatantly venal MP who tried one dodgy judge-bothering avenue to get her rapist husband off the hook would, er, try another one. I'm sure skskc was as shocked as I am.
Desperate stuff, Multers!
multitool
Guest
Writing a letter to a judge saying please be lenient with my husband versus asking the man in charge of the entire justice system to pressure the judge. One of these was a criminal attempt to pervert the course of justice (witnessed by Buckland...the real story here) and the other was not.
Yeah. "Precisely" the same, and of course your lack of surprise means you knew she would do this.
Amazing omniscience, TC. Why didn't you say something at the time?
Last edited:
theclaud
Reading around the chip
LOL, alright, Jess Phillips.
multitool
Guest
So today MPs voted on a motion to exclude MPs accused of serious offences at point of arrest rather than when charged. The Government wanted a higher bar.
The motion passed by one single vote. 170 to 169.
Guess whose vote that was, Claudine?
https://x.com/PippaCrerar/status/1790114501762674694
I rest my case.
The motion passed by one single vote. 170 to 169.
Guess whose vote that was, Claudine?
https://x.com/PippaCrerar/status/1790114501762674694
I rest my case.
Ian H
Legendary Member
Cynical move to ingratiate herself, obv.
multitool
Guest
Makes no difference what her motivations were.
What matters is the end result.
This vindicates exactly what I said last week. She isn't going to influence the Labour party in any way. She is going to damage the Tory majority.
