Ian H
Legendary Member
The Govt has poo-poohed Mandelsons words pretty promptly.
Keep up at the back.
Yebbut, how come Mandelson is behaving like a loose cannon?
The Govt has poo-poohed Mandelsons words pretty promptly.
Keep up at the back.
Yebbut, how come Mandelson is behaving like a loose cannon?
The Govt has poo-poohed Mandelsons words pretty promptly.
Keep up at the back.
Voters support cutting aid budget to fund higher defence spending, poll suggests – UK politics live https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2025/mar/03/peter-mandelson-ukraine-donald-trump-volodymyr-zelenskyy-keir-starmer-uk-politics-live?CMP=share_btn_url&page=with:block-67c5a1fb8f0837a340205d83#block-67c5a1fb8f0837a340205d83
I know my little group of drinking pals is not statistically significant, and, may not be representative of the UK population (average age is 75, all male, all retired, but, formerly, Accountant, Police Officer, Teacher, Software Engineer), I cannot be 100% certain (secret ballot and all that), but, I am fairly confident there are no Reform Supporters.
In our Poll, on Friday evening, it was 2 for 2 against, no abstentions)![]()
I see you've not come across Peter Mandelson before.
You LOLled as reports that the government had slapped down Mandelson, but didn't bother to explain what you found amusing. Was it that you enjoyed the notion of Mandelson being put in his place? Or are you implying that he wasn't?
Now you post yet another enigmatic statement free of substantive meaning. I accept this is your MO and it frees you from actually having to hold a considered opinion on anything, but it isn't particularly interesting. Sorry.
If my aunt had balls she'd have been my uncle
I hear comrade Starmer is very proud of your unwavering support. He apparently visitsNCAP on occasion and binge reads your contributions. He is troubled by your position on Israel, though. Your should strive to align with him in that subject too.
You LOLled as reports that the government had slapped down Mandelson, but didn't bother to explain what you found amusing. Was it that you enjoyed the notion of Mandelson being put in his place? Or are you implying that he wasn't?
Now you post yet another enigmatic statement free of substantive meaning. I accept this is your MO and it frees you from actually having to hold a considered opinion on anything, but it isn't particularly interesting. Sorry.