qigong chimp
Settler of gobby hash.
Bolders has discovered search engines; take cover everyone.
I don't know why you struggle to understand this.
Might make you proud, does nothing for me personally.
Seems a bit churlish to leave out the 100 or so Independent Schools in Scotland, I am sure they do their bit.
Are you relating this back in any way to that interview from Starmer?
Not knowingly, otherwise I would have quoted that post
So why on Earth are you responding to me? Read the thread and try to work out the context.
Don’t do twitter, so, don’t follow any twitter links.
Hold that thought ...I've not really been paying much attention to Starmer but also been willing to cut him a lot of slack since NotTory > Tory, and as I said before a dead badger would do a better job than this current lot, but what on Earth was that?
There are many things wrong there but does he really think that anyone who has issues with the English public school system somehow isn't patriotic enough?
Hold that thought ...
Starmer: "Whatever your race or belief, your dreams can come true."
You can get 150 quid for swapping your current account...its not all bad.I have a dream that my children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the contents of their bank account.
Exactly the same could be said of Margaret Thatcher and her becoming the first woman pm
Yes, which is why I would argue that anyone claiming that Thatcher's premiership (or May's, or Patel's tenure at the Home Office) was a 'win for women' should give their head a wobble. It's not a matter of two things being true at once, it's an objection to the dominant framing, which gives a progressive gloss to a pernicious government, especially as articulated by an opposition leader who is implicated in endemic racism in his own party hierarchy, stood as an establishment bulwark against a more progressive woman candidate and a woman of Indian heritage, and can't give a straight answer to a simple question about whether he has censored a British Indian MP. Anyway, I guarantee that if Clive Lewis or Dawn Butler ever get a(nother) shot at the leadership, you won't hear another whisper from Starmer about what a great milestone it is.
Yes, which is why I would argue that anyone claiming that Thatcher's premiership (or May's, or Patel's tenure at the Home Office) was a 'win for women' should give their head a wobble. It's not a matter of two things being true at once, it's an objection to the dominant framing, which gives a progressive gloss to a pernicious government, especially as articulated by an opposition leader who is implicated in endemic racism in his own party hierarchy, stood as an establishment bulwark against a more progressive woman candidate and a woman of Indian heritage, and can't give a straight answer to a simple question about whether he has censored a British Indian MP. Anyway, I guarantee that if Clive Lewis or Dawn Butler ever get a(nother) shot at the leadership, you won't hear another whisper from Starmer about what a great milestone it is.