icowden
Squire
Hmmm.... which one... which one to trust...This looks like an open and shut case, one of them is lying. So let’s see who it is.
It's a real head scratcher, that's for sure...
Hmmm.... which one... which one to trust...This looks like an open and shut case, one of them is lying. So let’s see who it is.
Hmmm.... which one... which one to trust...
It's a real head scratcher, that's for sure...
Do "legal costs" include compensation? (I thought the dispute was if Government told Post Office to delay Compensation Payments?).
Either way, lots of people who need a good kicking over this affair, not least of whom are Vennells (with or without "dog-collar").
Yeah. I’m not too sure that letter is a smoking gun.
Point 3 mentions engagement with the enquiry and reaching compensation payments.
£1.8million! Expensive or not, would it be more economical (among other things) to provide each asylum seeker with a house (as a gift) plus, a state funded income (say £30,000pa) for three years, until they "get established and begin earning". According to my simple maths skills, that would cost approximately £600,000 per asylum seeker (eg £500k for the house, and £100k for the income), it could be even cheaper if they were housed outside of the expensive South East.
Add in the new car and priority NHS access. You'll be close to what the average Mail reader believes already happens.