Bromptonaut
Rohan Man
- Location
- Bugbrooke, Northants
That's a fair point, I imagine a Labour government will alter the law accordingly when they get in.
And why not?
That's a fair point, I imagine a Labour government will alter the law accordingly when they get in.
That's a fair point, I imagine a Labour government will alter the law accordingly when they get in.
What are you talking about? What law? And altered to do what?
You thick or something?
Are you thick, or something?
Pears v Apples alert.
One reason some people who've got as far as Europe might seek to come to the UK for Asylum is because they're from a place where English is the main second language. There are of course other reasons including family, or whatever degree, or wider kith/clan being established here.
The issue in this bit, ie introduced by post #202 is Afghan women. They are applying to join their husbands who are here legitimately, presumably after being given Asylum. I wasn't aware of this but apparently applicants for a spousal visa are supposed to be proficient in English. Maybe I should have grasped the point given the number of battered or otherwise abused spouses I've given advice to and who speak better English than I do but there you go....
It seems to me that, thinking in the way law treats people in other fields, we ought to apply the idea of 'reasonable adjustments' where there is a real reason why (say) Afghan women who lack the opportunity to be educated at all, never mind to fluent English, should be 'cut some slack'.
But I don't suppose that's 'fair' in the eyes of the right wind media who seem to have Ministers by the short and curlies...
Careful now, we shouldn’t judge someone’s worth based on their English skills. They may have been denied a full education.
I agree.I type in the manner I speak in real life, "you f*ckin thick or summat?" would have been the question if sat face to face.
I'm fully aware 'Are you thick, or something' is more grammatically correct but it's far less 'personal' and I like personal when insulting someone.
You think others should be judged to a standard that needn’t apply to you? I wonder if there’s a word for that.Plus, I already live here so far less important.
This law that requires the need to speak English, call it policy or criteria then or whatever the f*ck people are whining about.
You thick or something?
Careful now, we shouldn’t judge someone’s worth based on their English skills. They may have been denied a full education.
You know you don't 'have' to be here listening to people 'whining' about deliberate cruelty being done to others.
You could just be out freely enjoying your lucky life and liberty, with no one persecuting you on account of your gender, skin colour, sexuality or whatever.
You know you don't 'have' to be here listening to people 'whining' about deliberate cruelty being done to others.
You could just be out freely enjoying your lucky life and liberty, with no one persecuting you on account of your gender, skin colour, sexuality or whatever.
Now where would the fun in that be?
Listening to you lot on here, well most, is one good way of ensuring I never vote anything other than Conservative no matter how bad they get.
Now where would the fun in that be?
Listening to you lot on here, well most, is one good way of ensuring I never vote anything other than Conservative no matter how bad they get.
@shep gets his persecution fix on here, but, I don't think it bothers him
Now where would the fun in that be?
Listening to you lot on here, well most, is one good way of ensuring I never vote anything other than Conservative no matter how bad they get.